Citation accuracy, misinformation, and harmless error in American Psychological Association amicus curiae briefs: Commentary on Marcus et al. (2025).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Psychologist
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001568
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citation accuracy, misinformation, and harmless error in American Psychological Association amicus curiae briefs: Commentary on Marcus et al. (2025).

David DeMatteo, Joel A. Dvoskin, Daniel A. Krauss
American Psychologist
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Citation accuracy, misinformation, and harmless error in American Psychological Association amicus curiae briefs: Commentary on Marcus et al. (2025).

David DeMatteo, Joel A. Dvoskin, Daniel A. Krauss
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
American PsychologistVol. 80(7)
Claremont McKenna College (US), University of Arizona (US), Hologic (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Citation accuracy, misinformation, and harmless error in American Psychological Association amicus curiae briefs: Commentary on Marcus et al. (2025). — David DeMatteo, Joel A. Dvoskin, et al. · American Psychologist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS