Why citation accuracy matters in psychological science: A commentary on Marcus et al. (2025) and call to the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Psychologist
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001571
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why citation accuracy matters in psychological science: A commentary on Marcus et al. (2025) and call to the field.

Cory L. Cobb, Seth J. Schwartz, Lawrence G. Watkins
American Psychologist
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Why citation accuracy matters in psychological science: A commentary on Marcus et al. (2025) and call to the field.

Cory L. Cobb, Seth J. Schwartz, Lawrence G. Watkins
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
American PsychologistVol. 80(7)
Texas A&M Health Science Center (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why citation accuracy matters in psychological science: A commentary on Marcus et al. (2025) and call to the field. — Cory L. Cobb, Seth J. Schwartz, et al. · American Psychologist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS