Monkeypox and the Nursing Frontline: A Narrative Literature Review of Readiness, Risk, and Response

Background: Monkeypox (Mpox) has resurfaced as a global health concern, extending beyond endemic areas into Southeast Asia, particularly Indonesia. Nurses, constituting the largest frontline workforce, are essential for outbreak identification, infection control, and community engagement. However, research indicates significant deficiencies in understanding, readiness, and vaccine adoption. Purpose: This review consolidates research about nurses' knowledge, attitudes, infection prevention practices, and vaccination preparedness during Mpox epidemics, highlighting their pivotal role in public health readiness. Methods: A systematic narrative review was performed in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, ScienceDirect) were examined for studies conducted between January 2022 and May 2025. Qualified studies included nurses or healthcare professionals in Mpox settings and examined at least one target domain. Data were thematically synthesized, and quality was evaluated utilizing Joanna Briggs Institute instruments. Results: Five papers fulfilled the criteria: two cross-sectional surveys, one meta-analysis, one qualitative interview, and one narrative review. Knowledge scores varied between 34% and 76.7%, exhibiting prevalent deficiencies in transmission and personal protective equipment utilization. Attitudes were ambivalent, shaped by apprehension, stigma, and workload. IPC compliance varied between 60% and 85%, frequently impeded by insufficient training and institutional backing. Vaccine adoption ranged from 50% to 58.5%, with hesitation associated with safety apprehensions and misinformation. Conclusion: Nurses are inadequately prepared for Mpox outbreaks, particularly in low- and middle-income environments. To address these deficiencies, it is essential to provide specialized training, psychosocial support, and to engage nurses as co-designers of preparedness plans rather than only as executors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Java Nursing Journal
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61716/jnj.v3i3.118
Primary Topic
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monkeypox and the Nursing Frontline: A Narrative Literature Review of Readiness, Risk, and Response

Mbaki Luyinda, Faith Nanjala, Amina Nabwire
Java Nursing Journal
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
article

Monkeypox and the Nursing Frontline: A Narrative Literature Review of Readiness, Risk, and Response

Mbaki Luyinda, Faith Nanjala, Amina Nabwire
article en

Abstract

Background: Monkeypox (Mpox) has resurfaced as a global health concern, extending beyond endemic areas into Southeast Asia, particularly Indonesia. Nurses, constituting the largest frontline workforce, are essential for outbreak identification, infection control, and community engagement. However, research indicates significant deficiencies in understanding, readiness, and vaccine adoption. Purpose: This review consolidates research about nurses' knowledge, attitudes, infection prevention practices, and vaccination preparedness during Mpox epidemics, highlighting their pivotal role in public health readiness. Methods: A systematic narrative review was performed in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, ScienceDirect) were examined for studies conducted between January 2022 and May 2025. Qualified studies included nurses or healthcare professionals in Mpox settings and examined at least one target domain. Data were thematically synthesized, and quality was evaluated utilizing Joanna Briggs Institute instruments. Results: Five papers fulfilled the criteria: two cross-sectional surveys, one meta-analysis, one qualitative interview, and one narrative review. Knowledge scores varied between 34% and 76.7%, exhibiting prevalent deficiencies in transmission and personal protective equipment utilization. Attitudes were ambivalent, shaped by apprehension, stigma, and workload. IPC compliance varied between 60% and 85%, frequently impeded by insufficient training and institutional backing. Vaccine adoption ranged from 50% to 58.5%, with hesitation associated with safety apprehensions and misinformation. Conclusion: Nurses are inadequately prepared for Mpox outbreaks, particularly in low- and middle-income environments. To address these deficiencies, it is essential to provide specialized training, psychosocial support, and to engage nurses as co-designers of preparedness plans rather than only as executors.

Java Nursing JournalVol. 3(3)
Soroti Hospital (UG), Kinshasa General Hospital (CD), University of Kikwit (CD), County Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.