A Study on Organizational Decision-making from the Perspective of Uncertainty and Ambiguity

This study examines the effects of ambiguity and uncertainty on organizational decision-making using an agent-based simulation framework. The model integrates hyperbolic discounting to capture shifts in decision-makers’ preferences from long- to short-term orientations over time. Ambiguity is defined as unclear organizational goals and decision criteria, whereas uncertainty refers to unpredictable environmental changes. The simulation showed that uncertainty strongly reduces decision efficiency, whereas ambiguity degrades decision quality. The results highlight how excessive ambiguity and uncertainty can lead to organizational resource inefficiencies. Specifically, I found that situations with high ambiguity and low uncertainty produced the least resource-efficient outcomes than situations with both high ambiguity and uncertainty. This study emphasizes the need to design decision processes that consider environmental complexity and recommends further empirical validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IIAI Letters on Business and Decision Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52731/lbds.v005.386
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Optimization Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on Organizational Decision-making from the Perspective of Uncertainty and Ambiguity

Ryosuke Ando
IIAI Letters on Business and Decision Science
Evaluation and Optimization Models
article

A Study on Organizational Decision-making from the Perspective of Uncertainty and Ambiguity

Ryosuke Ando
article en

Abstract

This study examines the effects of ambiguity and uncertainty on organizational decision-making using an agent-based simulation framework. The model integrates hyperbolic discounting to capture shifts in decision-makers’ preferences from long- to short-term orientations over time. Ambiguity is defined as unclear organizational goals and decision criteria, whereas uncertainty refers to unpredictable environmental changes. The simulation showed that uncertainty strongly reduces decision efficiency, whereas ambiguity degrades decision quality. The results highlight how excessive ambiguity and uncertainty can lead to organizational resource inefficiencies. Specifically, I found that situations with high ambiguity and low uncertainty produced the least resource-efficient outcomes than situations with both high ambiguity and uncertainty. This study emphasizes the need to design decision processes that consider environmental complexity and recommends further empirical validation.

IIAI Letters on Business and Decision ScienceVol. 5
Kagoshima University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Evaluation and Optimization Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Study on Organizational Decision-making from the Perspective of Uncertainty and Ambiguity — Ryosuke Ando · IIAI Letters on Business and Decision Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS