Comparative study of conventional versus digital bitewing radiographs for estimating alveolar bone level

Conventional and digital bitewing radiographs were taken for right posterior segments and analysis was done. Hence, 50 patients comprising of both male and females aged between 20-70 years were randomly selected for the study. The values obtained from two independent radiologists in conventional bitewing radiographs and with SOPRO imaging digital software in digital bitewing radiographic methods were compared to estimate the amount of bone height obtained through each method. No significant difference was found between the mean values of alveolar bone level measured by the two types of radiographs for all the sites; and is almost similar to those revealed on conventional radiographs.Thus, we show either of the two radiographic techniques <i>i.e.</i>, conventional and digital bitewing radiographs can be used interchangeably in epidemiologic studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300213147
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of conventional versus digital bitewing radiographs for estimating alveolar bone level

Himanshi Tomar, Trishna Saikia, Polysmita Ojah, Dharitri Bharali et al.
Bioinformation
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Comparative study of conventional versus digital bitewing radiographs for estimating alveolar bone level

Himanshi Tomar, Trishna Saikia, Polysmita Ojah, Dharitri Bharali, Queentaj Dutta, Murchana Mahanta
article en

Abstract

Conventional and digital bitewing radiographs were taken for right posterior segments and analysis was done. Hence, 50 patients comprising of both male and females aged between 20-70 years were randomly selected for the study. The values obtained from two independent radiologists in conventional bitewing radiographs and with SOPRO imaging digital software in digital bitewing radiographic methods were compared to estimate the amount of bone height obtained through each method. No significant difference was found between the mean values of alveolar bone level measured by the two types of radiographs for all the sites; and is almost similar to those revealed on conventional radiographs.Thus, we show either of the two radiographic techniques <i>i.e.</i>, conventional and digital bitewing radiographs can be used interchangeably in epidemiologic studies.

BioinformationVol. 21(09)
Dabur Research Foundation (India) (IN), Institute of Management Technology (IN), Government Dental College and Hospital (IN), Dibrugarh University (IN), Assam Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative study of conventional versus digital bitewing radiographs for estimating alveolar bone level — Himanshi Tomar, Trishna Saikia, et al. · Bioinformation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS