Injectable platelet rich fibrin versus low-level laser therapy for orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical split-mouth study

Accelerating tooth movement during orthodontic treatment is a growing focus in clinical orthodontics. Techniques like injectable platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) have demonstrated encouraging results. Hence, 20 patients aged 18-25 years were enrolled and one side of their maxillary arch was injected with intraligamental and submucosal i-PRF and the opposite side with LLLT (980nm, 100mW). Measurements were taken using digital vernier calliper on distal surface of canine to mesial surface of second premolar monthly for four months. The mean rate of space closure on i-PRF side (right) was significantly higher (2.85 ± 0.47 mm) than LLLT side (2.05 ± 0.28 mm; p<0.001). The left side (control group) showed no significant difference (p=0.833). Thus, i-PRF is more effective than LLLT in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. Further multicentre trials are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300213345
Primary Topic
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Injectable platelet rich fibrin versus low-level laser therapy for orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical split-mouth study

Sunilkumar Nagmode, Kunal Patil, Hrushikesh Aphale, Pranoti Gade et al.
Bioinformation
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
article

Injectable platelet rich fibrin versus low-level laser therapy for orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical split-mouth study

Sunilkumar Nagmode, Kunal Patil, Hrushikesh Aphale, Pranoti Gade, Payal Barse, Ekata Jaindesarda
article en

Abstract

Accelerating tooth movement during orthodontic treatment is a growing focus in clinical orthodontics. Techniques like injectable platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) have demonstrated encouraging results. Hence, 20 patients aged 18-25 years were enrolled and one side of their maxillary arch was injected with intraligamental and submucosal i-PRF and the opposite side with LLLT (980nm, 100mW). Measurements were taken using digital vernier calliper on distal surface of canine to mesial surface of second premolar monthly for four months. The mean rate of space closure on i-PRF side (right) was significantly higher (2.85 ± 0.47 mm) than LLLT side (2.05 ± 0.28 mm; p<0.001). The left side (control group) showed no significant difference (p=0.833). Thus, i-PRF is more effective than LLLT in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. Further multicentre trials are recommended.

BioinformationVol. 21(09)
ACPM Dental College and Hospital (IN), Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.