Diagnostic performance of ChatGPT in detecting gastrointestinal tract perforation on chest radiographs: a comparative study

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) tract perforation is a surgical emergency requiring rapid diagnosis, often via chest radiography. Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models like ChatGPT, has potential to enhance medical imaging but its efficacy in detecting GI perforation is unclear. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 with human experts in interpreting chest radiographs for GI perforation. Methods: This retrospective study, approved by the Arel University Hospital Ethics Committee (E-52857131-050.06.04-455896), analyzed 504 chest radiographs from patients diagnosed with GI perforation between 2010 and 2021. Radiographs were classified into three groups: definite GI perforation, suspicious requiring further imaging, or no perforation. Two clinicians (emergency medicine specialist and general surgeon) independently evaluated radiographs, followed by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 using a standardized prompt. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with chi-square tests, and decision-making times with Student’s t-test (p

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Trends in Medical Investigation
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64512/jtmi.2025.11
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic performance of ChatGPT in detecting gastrointestinal tract perforation on chest radiographs: a comparative study

Merve Tokoçin, Onur Tokoçin
Journal of Trends in Medical Investigation
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Diagnostic performance of ChatGPT in detecting gastrointestinal tract perforation on chest radiographs: a comparative study

Merve Tokoçin, Onur Tokoçin
article en

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) tract perforation is a surgical emergency requiring rapid diagnosis, often via chest radiography. Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models like ChatGPT, has potential to enhance medical imaging but its efficacy in detecting GI perforation is unclear. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 with human experts in interpreting chest radiographs for GI perforation. Methods: This retrospective study, approved by the Arel University Hospital Ethics Committee (E-52857131-050.06.04-455896), analyzed 504 chest radiographs from patients diagnosed with GI perforation between 2010 and 2021. Radiographs were classified into three groups: definite GI perforation, suspicious requiring further imaging, or no perforation. Two clinicians (emergency medicine specialist and general surgeon) independently evaluated radiographs, followed by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 using a standardized prompt. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with chi-square tests, and decision-making times with Student’s t-test (p

Journal of Trends in Medical InvestigationVol. 1(2)
Istanbul Eye Hospital (TR), Altınbaş University (TR), Istanbul Arel University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diagnostic performance of ChatGPT in detecting gastrointestinal tract perforation on chest radiographs: a comparative study — Merve Tokoçin, Onur Tokoçin · Journal of Trends in Medical Investigation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS