Impact of Forensic Evidence on Outcome of Criminal Trials

This research study aims to identify the impact of different types of forensic evidence like DNA, Fingerprint on outcome of different type of criminal trials. The research methodology used in this study was both qualitative and quantitative. Data used was taken from primary as well secondary sources. Research study was doctrinal in nature. Data was collected from last five years from 2019 to 2023 reported judgements of supreme court in which forensic evidence was utilized and Data was analyzed further to see its impact. Data collected showed that there are different loopholes in admissibility of forensic evidence like lack of evidence collection, lack of evidence preservation, lack of training of concerned personnels, limited number of laboratories etc. Data shows that there is no significant co-relation found between admissibility of forensic evidence and outcome of criminal trial. It is concluded that the rate of conviction is 48% if case is decided on forensic evidence admitted and relied by the court. It was also concluded that loopholes identified in the admissibility of forensic evidence showed that training of personnel, enhancing forensic laboratories, suitably amending laws and proper handling of forensic evidence will increase the current scenario and maximize the conviction rate.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law & Social Studies
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52279/jlss.07.03.142153
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Forensic Evidence on Outcome of Criminal Trials

I. Khan, Muhammad Aamir Ercylan
Journal of Law & Social Studies
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Impact of Forensic Evidence on Outcome of Criminal Trials

I. Khan, Muhammad Aamir Ercylan
article en

Abstract

This research study aims to identify the impact of different types of forensic evidence like DNA, Fingerprint on outcome of different type of criminal trials. The research methodology used in this study was both qualitative and quantitative. Data used was taken from primary as well secondary sources. Research study was doctrinal in nature. Data was collected from last five years from 2019 to 2023 reported judgements of supreme court in which forensic evidence was utilized and Data was analyzed further to see its impact. Data collected showed that there are different loopholes in admissibility of forensic evidence like lack of evidence collection, lack of evidence preservation, lack of training of concerned personnels, limited number of laboratories etc. Data shows that there is no significant co-relation found between admissibility of forensic evidence and outcome of criminal trial. It is concluded that the rate of conviction is 48% if case is decided on forensic evidence admitted and relied by the court. It was also concluded that loopholes identified in the admissibility of forensic evidence showed that training of personnel, enhancing forensic laboratories, suitably amending laws and proper handling of forensic evidence will increase the current scenario and maximize the conviction rate.

Journal of Law & Social StudiesVol. 7(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Forensic Evidence on Outcome of Criminal Trials — I. Khan, Muhammad Aamir Ercylan · Journal of Law & Social Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS