Is the Likert Scale Still IN in 2025? Revisiting Usage, Interpretation, and the Rounding Paradigm

The Likert scale remains one of the most valuable instruments for studying education and the social sciences, as it is simple to use, quick to administer, and adaptable. Its effectiveness will be determined by how successfully it is used in 2025. Experts debate whether it is beneficial or detrimental to group data and analyze it using parametric tests. Some argue that this strategy is easily abused, particularly when individuals believe that decimalization implies completely revealing what people think. This study found that these kinds of actions can give individuals an inaccurate impression about how accurate something is and influence how decisions are made in business, education, research, and politics. To address these issues, a rounding-based understanding technique is proposed. It employs mode-based tests, ordinal reasoning, and rounding to whole numbers to ensure that the findings are accurate. To maintain the validity and utility of the Likert scale, researchers must apply it in a methodologically sound, unambiguous, and ethically correct manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i5.36
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the Likert Scale Still IN in 2025? Revisiting Usage, Interpretation, and the Rounding Paradigm

Rogen Doronila, Rujonel Cariaga
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Is the Likert Scale Still IN in 2025? Revisiting Usage, Interpretation, and the Rounding Paradigm

Rogen Doronila, Rujonel Cariaga
article en

Abstract

The Likert scale remains one of the most valuable instruments for studying education and the social sciences, as it is simple to use, quick to administer, and adaptable. Its effectiveness will be determined by how successfully it is used in 2025. Experts debate whether it is beneficial or detrimental to group data and analyze it using parametric tests. Some argue that this strategy is easily abused, particularly when individuals believe that decimalization implies completely revealing what people think. This study found that these kinds of actions can give individuals an inaccurate impression about how accurate something is and influence how decisions are made in business, education, research, and politics. To address these issues, a rounding-based understanding technique is proposed. It employs mode-based tests, ordinal reasoning, and rounding to whole numbers to ensure that the findings are accurate. To maintain the validity and utility of the Likert scale, researchers must apply it in a methodologically sound, unambiguous, and ethically correct manner.

International Journal of Interdisciplinary ViewpointsVol. 1(5)
Notre Dame of Dadiangas University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is the Likert Scale Still IN in 2025? Revisiting Usage, Interpretation, and the Rounding Paradigm — Rogen Doronila, Rujonel Cariaga · International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS