Return without a guarantee: Personal development and retro-innovations

Relevance of the study: in the context of the social and cultural transformation of modern society, there is a growing interest in traditional personal-development practices, which stimulates the emergence of such phenomenon as retro-innovations. The purpose of the study is to consider the concept and phenomenon of retro-innovations and to show the limitations and risks of their use in education today. Results: the study has revealed the essence of the phenomenon, theoretical and methodological grounding for its introduction as a category of the personal-development theory and practice; the risks arising from the implementation of retro-innovations are shown. The author emphasizes the ambiguity of the term “retro-innovation” and distances from its apologetics, considering it as a journalistic rather than a scientific category. The study also presents the reasons for the introduction of retro-innovations as an independent concept and a pedagogical phenomenon. It is noted that, despite the active use of this term in scientific discussions, its necessity remains controversial, since the key aspects of retro-innovations are covered by the well-known categories of “tradition” and “innovation”. It is assumed that a return to the previous personal-development techniques and forms can be justified only if they are meaningfully transformed and adapted to modern educational conditions. Special attention is paid to the risks of formalism, loss of variability and ignoring students’ changing needs. Among possible negative consequences, the author considers potential outdated orientation of retro-innovations, which may hinder the introduction of new teaching methods and reduce the flexibility of educational systems. The study points out the possibility of idealizing educational practices of the past without taking into account their shortcomings. This may make it difficult to adequately adapt traditional practices to modern conditions. Main conclusions: the research proves that retro-innovations, which are devoid of critical expertise and methodological support, can hinder true pedagogical renewal. At the same time, it is emphasized that with proper reflection, retro-innovations can be used as a resource of educational continuity and as a tool for culturally oriented modernization. Practical significance: the results of the study allow a critical approach to introducing retro-innovations into the modern personal- development educational process which should be combined with the assessment of their productivity and risks of application.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Izvestiya of Saratov University Educational Acmeology Developmental Psychology
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2025-14-3-272-282
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human Resource and Talent Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Return without a guarantee: Personal development and retro-innovations

Nataliya L. Selivanova
1 citations
Izvestiya of Saratov University Educational Acmeology Developmental Psychology
Human Resource and Talent Management
2.76
article

Return without a guarantee: Personal development and retro-innovations

Nataliya L. Selivanova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Relevance of the study: in the context of the social and cultural transformation of modern society, there is a growing interest in traditional personal-development practices, which stimulates the emergence of such phenomenon as retro-innovations. The purpose of the study is to consider the concept and phenomenon of retro-innovations and to show the limitations and risks of their use in education today. Results: the study has revealed the essence of the phenomenon, theoretical and methodological grounding for its introduction as a category of the personal-development theory and practice; the risks arising from the implementation of retro-innovations are shown. The author emphasizes the ambiguity of the term “retro-innovation” and distances from its apologetics, considering it as a journalistic rather than a scientific category. The study also presents the reasons for the introduction of retro-innovations as an independent concept and a pedagogical phenomenon. It is noted that, despite the active use of this term in scientific discussions, its necessity remains controversial, since the key aspects of retro-innovations are covered by the well-known categories of “tradition” and “innovation”. It is assumed that a return to the previous personal-development techniques and forms can be justified only if they are meaningfully transformed and adapted to modern educational conditions. Special attention is paid to the risks of formalism, loss of variability and ignoring students’ changing needs. Among possible negative consequences, the author considers potential outdated orientation of retro-innovations, which may hinder the introduction of new teaching methods and reduce the flexibility of educational systems. The study points out the possibility of idealizing educational practices of the past without taking into account their shortcomings. This may make it difficult to adequately adapt traditional practices to modern conditions. Main conclusions: the research proves that retro-innovations, which are devoid of critical expertise and methodological support, can hinder true pedagogical renewal. At the same time, it is emphasized that with proper reflection, retro-innovations can be used as a resource of educational continuity and as a tool for culturally oriented modernization. Practical significance: the results of the study allow a critical approach to introducing retro-innovations into the modern personal- development educational process which should be combined with the assessment of their productivity and risks of application.

Izvestiya of Saratov University Educational Acmeology Developmental PsychologyVol. 14(3 (55))
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human Resource and Talent Management
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.