Magmatism and geodynamic scenarios at the Archean-Paleoproterozoic boundary. A view from Karelia

This study synthesizes the findings on the geodynamic regimes of emplacement and development of igneous rocks and associated terrigenous complexes forming the supracrustal part of the Vodlozero Terrane (southeastern part of the Karelian Craton) during the Mesoarchean – Paleoproterozoic interval. Early geodynamic processes (during the Meso-Neoarchean) are reconstructed based on the study of key strato-tectonic associations of the Vedlozero-Segozero Greenstone Belt. The transformation of geodynamic regimes during cratonization in the Paleoproterozoic is substantiated by the example of the Onega Basin’s formations, which overlie the greenstone complex. It is established that crustal formation in the Vodlozero Terrane during the Meso-Neoarchean was controlled by subduction-collisional processes, comparable in duration to a full Wilson cycle. After the stage of continental crust stabilization, around 2.5 billion years ago, magmatic reactivation of the territory occurred. The Karelian Craton experienced an uplift and intense erosion, which led to the formation of subaerial weathering crusts. The change in geodynamic regimes was triggered by the onset of a plume event, heralding the formation of a large igneous province. The development of the territory occurred under conditions of continental rifting (in the interval 2.5–2.45 billion years) with the formation of a siliceous high-Mg andesibasalt association. This association is characterized by a dual geochemical nature – plume and subduction-related – which is explained by the involvement of Archean slab fragments in melting and contamination by melts of sanukitoid granitoids.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17076/geo2181
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magmatism and geodynamic scenarios at the Archean-Paleoproterozoic boundary. A view from Karelia

Зоя Павловна Рыбникова, Maxim Gogolev, Zoya Rybnikova, Максим Александрович Гоголев et al.
Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Magmatism and geodynamic scenarios at the Archean-Paleoproterozoic boundary. A view from Karelia

Зоя Павловна Рыбникова, Maxim Gogolev, Zoya Rybnikova, Максим Александрович Гоголев, Александра Владимировна Бакаева, С. А. Светов, Alexandra Bakaeva
article en

Abstract

This study synthesizes the findings on the geodynamic regimes of emplacement and development of igneous rocks and associated terrigenous complexes forming the supracrustal part of the Vodlozero Terrane (southeastern part of the Karelian Craton) during the Mesoarchean – Paleoproterozoic interval. Early geodynamic processes (during the Meso-Neoarchean) are reconstructed based on the study of key strato-tectonic associations of the Vedlozero-Segozero Greenstone Belt. The transformation of geodynamic regimes during cratonization in the Paleoproterozoic is substantiated by the example of the Onega Basin’s formations, which overlie the greenstone complex. It is established that crustal formation in the Vodlozero Terrane during the Meso-Neoarchean was controlled by subduction-collisional processes, comparable in duration to a full Wilson cycle. After the stage of continental crust stabilization, around 2.5 billion years ago, magmatic reactivation of the territory occurred. The Karelian Craton experienced an uplift and intense erosion, which led to the formation of subaerial weathering crusts. The change in geodynamic regimes was triggered by the onset of a plume event, heralding the formation of a large igneous province. The development of the territory occurred under conditions of continental rifting (in the interval 2.5–2.45 billion years) with the formation of a siliceous high-Mg andesibasalt association. This association is characterized by a dual geochemical nature – plume and subduction-related – which is explained by the involvement of Archean slab fragments in melting and contamination by melts of sanukitoid granitoids.

Proceedings of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.