Weight stigma exposure inventory (WeSEI): Validity and reliability study of the Chinese version in Hong Kong

This study examined the validity and reliability of the Weight Stigma Exposure Inventory (WeSEI), Chinese version, among the Hong Kong population. The WeSEI was developed by Ruckwongpatr et al. (2025) and then translated by the present authors to Chinese for the Hong Kong population. The study recruited 949 Hong Kong adults (Meanage = 23.07; 68.6% female) to complete the 35-item WeSEI, a self-report instrument with seven factors (television sources, traditional media sources, social media sources, parental sources, extraneous sources, significant other sources, and friends sources). The seven factors assess how participants observed (or were exposed to) weight stigma from different sources. The psychometric properties of the scale analyzed in the present study included factor structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency using McDonald's ω and Cronbach's α, discriminant validity using heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio, and convergent validity using average variance extracted (AVE) values. Pearson correlations with related measures, such as the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport (TAPAS), Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ), and Perceived Weight Stigmatization Scale (PWSS), were used to assess WeSEI’s concurrent validity. The findings indicate that the WeSEI has a confirmed seven-factor structure, possesses high internal consistency, and exhibits acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. The WeSEI total score and its subscale scores showed statistically positive correlations with the other measures used. The WeSEI Chinese version can be used as a valid and reliable self-report psychometric tool for assessing Hong Kong participants' exposure to weight stigma in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Media Research
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29329/jsomer.47
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weight stigma exposure inventory (WeSEI): Validity and reliability study of the Chinese version in Hong Kong

Ali Gökalp, Ji‐Kang Chen, Oscar Rhodes, Chia-Wei Fan et al.
5 citations
Journal of Social Media Research
Obesity and Health Practices
10.11
article

Weight stigma exposure inventory (WeSEI): Validity and reliability study of the Chinese version in Hong Kong

Ali Gökalp, Ji‐Kang Chen, Oscar Rhodes, Chia-Wei Fan, Kerry O’Brien, Chung‐Ying Lin, Nail Değirmenci
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study examined the validity and reliability of the Weight Stigma Exposure Inventory (WeSEI), Chinese version, among the Hong Kong population. The WeSEI was developed by Ruckwongpatr et al. (2025) and then translated by the present authors to Chinese for the Hong Kong population. The study recruited 949 Hong Kong adults (Meanage = 23.07; 68.6% female) to complete the 35-item WeSEI, a self-report instrument with seven factors (television sources, traditional media sources, social media sources, parental sources, extraneous sources, significant other sources, and friends sources). The seven factors assess how participants observed (or were exposed to) weight stigma from different sources. The psychometric properties of the scale analyzed in the present study included factor structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency using McDonald's ω and Cronbach's α, discriminant validity using heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio, and convergent validity using average variance extracted (AVE) values. Pearson correlations with related measures, such as the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport (TAPAS), Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ), and Perceived Weight Stigmatization Scale (PWSS), were used to assess WeSEI’s concurrent validity. The findings indicate that the WeSEI has a confirmed seven-factor structure, possesses high internal consistency, and exhibits acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. The WeSEI total score and its subscale scores showed statistically positive correlations with the other measures used. The WeSEI Chinese version can be used as a valid and reliable self-report psychometric tool for assessing Hong Kong participants' exposure to weight stigma in future research.

Journal of Social Media ResearchVol. 2(3)
Universitat de València (ES), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Adventist University of Health Sciences (US), Monash University (AU), Gaziantep University (TR), National Cheng Kung University (TW), Gazi University (TR)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Obesity and Health Practices
10.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.