8271982 Occupational factors of Long-COVID in a population-based cohort in Catalonia: the COVICAT study

<h3>Objective</h3> Occupational factors affect SARS-CoV2 infection risk, but the consequent Long-COVID burden is unknown. We aimed to fill in this research gap by using individual data in a population-based cohort. <h3>Methods</h3> In the large prospective COVICAT study, 2020-2023, Catalonia, Spain, we examined the association between occupational determinants and Long-COVID. Among subjects with previous SARS-CoV2 infection, those employed during the pandemic and with occupational information were analyzed. Different metrics, including 4 job-exposure matrices, were used to evaluate individual occupational risk factors for Long-COVID (post-infection symptoms ≥3months). Poisson models were used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). <h3>Results</h3> Among 2054 workers (1308 women, 746 men) aged 40-69 years, 486 developed Long-COVID (23.7%). Individual risk factors were female sex (RR:1.45;CIs:1.22-1.73), low education (1.31;0.97-1.76), obesity (1.19;0.97-1.47), co-morbidities (2.32;1.75-3.07 for 3+ diseases), and previous symptomatic vs. asymptomatic SARS-CoV2 infection (3.32;2.19-5.06 for mild/moderate, 9.60;6.10-15.1 for severe/critical). Protective factors were COVID-19 vaccination (0.53;0.43-0.64), and older age (0.90 per 10-year increase). Workers in jobs at high COVID-19 risk according to all metrics (health/social care, education, retail, transport, and security) showed higher Long-COVID risk. The main drivers of increased risk were close contact with colleagues and the public (RR up to 1.50;1.18-1.90), no social distance at workplace (up to 1.47;1.16-1.85), no use of facemask (1.41;1.09-1.83), commute by public transport (1.56;1.18-2.05), and night shift work (1.88;1.38-2.56). <h3>Conclusion</h3> In a population-based cohort, several occupational factors increased Long-COVID risk. Focused preventive strategies are warranted to avoid the associated public health burden. Long-COVID should be recognized/compensated as an occupational disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-epicohabstracts.140
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8271982 Occupational factors of Long-COVID in a population-based cohort in Catalonia: the COVICAT study

Sara De Matteis, Miguel Ángel Alba Hidalgo, Manolis Kogevinas, Judith García‐Aymerich et al.
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

8271982 Occupational factors of Long-COVID in a population-based cohort in Catalonia: the COVICAT study

Sara De Matteis, Miguel Ángel Alba Hidalgo, Manolis Kogevinas, Judith García‐Aymerich, Kyriaki Papantoniou, Dario Consonni, Rafael de Cid, Ana Espinosa, Marianna Karachaliou, Kurt Straíf, Gemma Castaño‐Vinyals, Natalia Blay Magriña
article en

Abstract

<h3>Objective</h3> Occupational factors affect SARS-CoV2 infection risk, but the consequent Long-COVID burden is unknown. We aimed to fill in this research gap by using individual data in a population-based cohort. <h3>Methods</h3> In the large prospective COVICAT study, 2020-2023, Catalonia, Spain, we examined the association between occupational determinants and Long-COVID. Among subjects with previous SARS-CoV2 infection, those employed during the pandemic and with occupational information were analyzed. Different metrics, including 4 job-exposure matrices, were used to evaluate individual occupational risk factors for Long-COVID (post-infection symptoms ≥3months). Poisson models were used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). <h3>Results</h3> Among 2054 workers (1308 women, 746 men) aged 40-69 years, 486 developed Long-COVID (23.7%). Individual risk factors were female sex (RR:1.45;CIs:1.22-1.73), low education (1.31;0.97-1.76), obesity (1.19;0.97-1.47), co-morbidities (2.32;1.75-3.07 for 3+ diseases), and previous symptomatic vs. asymptomatic SARS-CoV2 infection (3.32;2.19-5.06 for mild/moderate, 9.60;6.10-15.1 for severe/critical). Protective factors were COVID-19 vaccination (0.53;0.43-0.64), and older age (0.90 per 10-year increase). Workers in jobs at high COVID-19 risk according to all metrics (health/social care, education, retail, transport, and security) showed higher Long-COVID risk. The main drivers of increased risk were close contact with colleagues and the public (RR up to 1.50;1.18-1.90), no social distance at workplace (up to 1.47;1.16-1.85), no use of facemask (1.41;1.09-1.83), commute by public transport (1.56;1.18-2.05), and night shift work (1.88;1.38-2.56). <h3>Conclusion</h3> In a population-based cohort, several occupational factors increased Long-COVID risk. Focused preventive strategies are warranted to avoid the associated public health burden. Long-COVID should be recognized/compensated as an occupational disease.

Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.