8287803 Evaluating quick return restrictions on sickness absence in healthcare employees: a difference-in-differences study

<h3>Background</h3> Quick returns in shift work have been linked to adverse health effects. The 2020 reform of Working Time Act in Finland limited rest periods under 11h in irregular shift work. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> This observational longitudinal study, analysed as a quasi-experiment, used a difference-in-differences regression analysis with unit and time fixed effects and robust standard errors to evaluate the changes in quick returns and sickness absence following the 2020 reform. We assessed changes in sickness absence from 2019 to 2021 across hospital work units. The study compared units mandated to limit quick returns (Treatment group; 416 units, over 20,500 employees, 72% in nursing) with units that had low levels of quick returns prior to the reform and did not need to limit quick returns (Control group; 37 units, over 1700 employees, 70% in nursing). <h3>Results</h3> Simple regression analysis with fixed effects for unit and time over 2019–2020 showed a less pronounced increase in sickness absence by −0.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.3 to −0.1) for the treatment group compared to the control group, indicating a 13% lower rate of sickness absence. For the period 2019–2021, the estimate was −0.5 percentage points (95% CI: −1.0 to 0.0). When incorporating covariates and inverse probability weighting, the estimates were more substantial with narrower confidence intervals: −0.9 percentage points (95% CI: −1.4 to −0.3) for 2019–2020, and −0.6 percentage points (95% CI: −1.2 to −0.1) for 2019–2021. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The problematic characteristics and consequences of shift work can be controlled, through legislation also. Policymakers and managers should evaluate and adjust the frequency of quick returns to achieve the potential effects on employee well-being, health, and operational efficiency, which in this study was indicated by the reduction in sickness absence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-epicohabstracts.181
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8287803 Evaluating quick return restrictions on sickness absence in healthcare employees: a difference-in-differences study

Kati Karhula, Annina Ropponen, Kari Hämäläinen, Mikko Härmä et al.
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

8287803 Evaluating quick return restrictions on sickness absence in healthcare employees: a difference-in-differences study

Kati Karhula, Annina Ropponen, Kari Hämäläinen, Mikko Härmä, Rahman Shiri, Jenni Ervasti, Aki Koskinen, Jaakko Pehkonen, Jarno Turunen, Mikael Sallinen, Olli Haavisto
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Quick returns in shift work have been linked to adverse health effects. The 2020 reform of Working Time Act in Finland limited rest periods under 11h in irregular shift work. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> This observational longitudinal study, analysed as a quasi-experiment, used a difference-in-differences regression analysis with unit and time fixed effects and robust standard errors to evaluate the changes in quick returns and sickness absence following the 2020 reform. We assessed changes in sickness absence from 2019 to 2021 across hospital work units. The study compared units mandated to limit quick returns (Treatment group; 416 units, over 20,500 employees, 72% in nursing) with units that had low levels of quick returns prior to the reform and did not need to limit quick returns (Control group; 37 units, over 1700 employees, 70% in nursing). <h3>Results</h3> Simple regression analysis with fixed effects for unit and time over 2019–2020 showed a less pronounced increase in sickness absence by −0.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.3 to −0.1) for the treatment group compared to the control group, indicating a 13% lower rate of sickness absence. For the period 2019–2021, the estimate was −0.5 percentage points (95% CI: −1.0 to 0.0). When incorporating covariates and inverse probability weighting, the estimates were more substantial with narrower confidence intervals: −0.9 percentage points (95% CI: −1.4 to −0.3) for 2019–2020, and −0.6 percentage points (95% CI: −1.2 to −0.1) for 2019–2021. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The problematic characteristics and consequences of shift work can be controlled, through legislation also. Policymakers and managers should evaluate and adjust the frequency of quick returns to achieve the potential effects on employee well-being, health, and operational efficiency, which in this study was indicated by the reduction in sickness absence.

Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.