8292418 Lung cancer risk among 2.2 million Ontario workers: joint effects of co-exposure to five occupational carcinogens by sex

<h3>Objectives</h3> Several occupational exposures cause lung cancer, but few studies have examined co-exposure effects. We aim to investigate the joint effects of exposure to five carcinogens— asbestos, chromium VI, nickel, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and benzo-a-pyrene (BaP) as a surrogate of PAH exposure, and silica— on lung cancer risk. <h3>Methods</h3> Lung cancer cases were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry between 1983 to 2019 from a large cohort of Ontario workers. Exposure status (exposed/non-exposed) was assigned to workers based on their occupation using the Canadian job-exposure matrix for each carcinogen. Cox proportional hazards models estimated associations of carcinogen exposure on lung cancer risk overall, by sex, and by subtype, controlling for age, sex, and birth-year. Joint effects were analyzed using pairwise interaction models assessed on multiplicative and additive scales using the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). <h3>Results</h3> Overall, 36,125 lung cancer cases were identified among 2,223,408 workers. In preliminary analysis, joint effects of co-exposure to asbestos/silica (RERI= 0.27, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.39), BaP/silica (RERI=0.28, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.39), PAHS/silica (RERI=0.14, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.23), and chromium/BaP (RERI= 0.20, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.42) were more than additive. Conversely, joint effects of asbestos/PAHs (RERI: -0.44, 95% CI: -0.68, -0.24), BaP/nickel (RERI= -0.11, 95% CI: -0.21, -0.01), and chromium/PAHs (RERI=-0.38, 95% CI: -0.60, -0.18) were less than additive. The remaining pairwise joint effects did not significantly depart from additivity. The pattern of results was similar among male workers, but no pairwise joint effects significantly departed from additivity for females. Differences by lung cancer sub-type and additional analyses to follow. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Significant interaction effects were observed. Ongoing joint effects analysis may help identify high-risk occupations/industries by discovering the most impactful exposure combinations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-epicohabstracts.4
Primary Topic
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8292418 Lung cancer risk among 2.2 million Ontario workers: joint effects of co-exposure to five occupational carcinogens by sex

Fatima Ali, Nathan DeBono, Tanya Navaneelan, Tracy L Kirkham et al.
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
article

8292418 Lung cancer risk among 2.2 million Ontario workers: joint effects of co-exposure to five occupational carcinogens by sex

Fatima Ali, Nathan DeBono, Tanya Navaneelan, Tracy L Kirkham, Jeavana Sritharan, Paul A. Demers, Shannon Halls
article en

Abstract

<h3>Objectives</h3> Several occupational exposures cause lung cancer, but few studies have examined co-exposure effects. We aim to investigate the joint effects of exposure to five carcinogens— asbestos, chromium VI, nickel, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and benzo-a-pyrene (BaP) as a surrogate of PAH exposure, and silica— on lung cancer risk. <h3>Methods</h3> Lung cancer cases were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry between 1983 to 2019 from a large cohort of Ontario workers. Exposure status (exposed/non-exposed) was assigned to workers based on their occupation using the Canadian job-exposure matrix for each carcinogen. Cox proportional hazards models estimated associations of carcinogen exposure on lung cancer risk overall, by sex, and by subtype, controlling for age, sex, and birth-year. Joint effects were analyzed using pairwise interaction models assessed on multiplicative and additive scales using the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). <h3>Results</h3> Overall, 36,125 lung cancer cases were identified among 2,223,408 workers. In preliminary analysis, joint effects of co-exposure to asbestos/silica (RERI= 0.27, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.39), BaP/silica (RERI=0.28, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.39), PAHS/silica (RERI=0.14, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.23), and chromium/BaP (RERI= 0.20, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.42) were more than additive. Conversely, joint effects of asbestos/PAHs (RERI: -0.44, 95% CI: -0.68, -0.24), BaP/nickel (RERI= -0.11, 95% CI: -0.21, -0.01), and chromium/PAHs (RERI=-0.38, 95% CI: -0.60, -0.18) were less than additive. The remaining pairwise joint effects did not significantly depart from additivity. The pattern of results was similar among male workers, but no pairwise joint effects significantly departed from additivity for females. Differences by lung cancer sub-type and additional analyses to follow. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Significant interaction effects were observed. Ongoing joint effects analysis may help identify high-risk occupations/industries by discovering the most impactful exposure combinations.

Occupational Cancer Research Centre (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.