8275516 The impact of a sleep intervention on shift workers: improved subjective sleep without objective changes

<h3>Objective</h3> Shift work is associated with disturbed sleep and adverse health effects. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of two interventions, i.e. personalized sleep or nutritional advice, on sleep duration and quality in real-life shift workers. <h3>Methods</h3> This controlled intervention study included 57 healthy shift workers working 12-hour shifts. Participants received tailored advice based on their work schedule, social obligations, and physiological markers. The sleep advice focused on sleep timing, multiple sleep episodes, and sleep hygiene education, while the nutritional guidance structured meal timing, macronutrient distribution, and energy intake. Sleep was assessed objectively through actigraphy at baseline, start intervention and post-intervention (averaging 13 night shifts, 6 early shifts and 20 free days per participant). Subjective sleep was measured with the Insomnia Severity Index at baseline, post-intervention and follow-up. Mixed-effects models with a random intercept were used, adjusted for age, chronotype and household. <h3>Results</h3> Participants experienced on average shorter sleep duration when working night and early shifts, compared to recovery days. Neither intervention changed the objective sleep duration or quality. Participants who received the sleep advice had significantly higher insomnia scores at baseline, and their scores had decreased to match those of the other groups on post-intervention and during follow-up 8 months after the intervention. No such effects were observed for the nutritional guidance. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Personalized sleep guidance improved subjective sleep experience (insomnia scores) but had no effect on objective sleep measures, highlighting the disconnect between subjective experience and objective sleep metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-epicohabstracts.183
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8275516 The impact of a sleep intervention on shift workers: improved subjective sleep without objective changes

Johanneke E. Oosterman, Suzan Wopereis, Martijn E.T. Dollé, Heidi M. Lammers‐van der Holst et al.
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

8275516 The impact of a sleep intervention on shift workers: improved subjective sleep without objective changes

Johanneke E. Oosterman, Suzan Wopereis, Martijn E.T. Dollé, Heidi M. Lammers‐van der Holst, Linda W. M. van Kerkhof, Alex Burdorf, Maaike van der Rhee
article en

Abstract

<h3>Objective</h3> Shift work is associated with disturbed sleep and adverse health effects. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of two interventions, i.e. personalized sleep or nutritional advice, on sleep duration and quality in real-life shift workers. <h3>Methods</h3> This controlled intervention study included 57 healthy shift workers working 12-hour shifts. Participants received tailored advice based on their work schedule, social obligations, and physiological markers. The sleep advice focused on sleep timing, multiple sleep episodes, and sleep hygiene education, while the nutritional guidance structured meal timing, macronutrient distribution, and energy intake. Sleep was assessed objectively through actigraphy at baseline, start intervention and post-intervention (averaging 13 night shifts, 6 early shifts and 20 free days per participant). Subjective sleep was measured with the Insomnia Severity Index at baseline, post-intervention and follow-up. Mixed-effects models with a random intercept were used, adjusted for age, chronotype and household. <h3>Results</h3> Participants experienced on average shorter sleep duration when working night and early shifts, compared to recovery days. Neither intervention changed the objective sleep duration or quality. Participants who received the sleep advice had significantly higher insomnia scores at baseline, and their scores had decreased to match those of the other groups on post-intervention and during follow-up 8 months after the intervention. No such effects were observed for the nutritional guidance. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Personalized sleep guidance improved subjective sleep experience (insomnia scores) but had no effect on objective sleep measures, highlighting the disconnect between subjective experience and objective sleep metrics.

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.