8276833 A quantitative algorithm to estimate endotoxin exposure for the spouses in the Agricultural Health Study

<h3>Objective</h3> Agricultural studies mostly focus on farmers’ exposures, but their family members often conduct similar agricultural tasks. To quantify the endotoxin exposure for spouses of farmers in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), we modified an algorithm previously developed for AHS farmers in the Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect in Agriculture (BEEA) sub-study. <h3>Methods</h3> The BEEA algorithm quantified endotoxin exposure for 13 bioaerosol-related agricultural tasks queried via questionnaire. It multiplied task frequency by task-specific intensity derived from meta-analyses of published endotoxin measurements. The AHS enrollment questionnaire completed by 32,345 spouses (&gt;99% female) included 5 of these tasks, three with frequency information (‘number of times’: poultry contact, swine contact, milking cows), and two with yes/no information (grinding feed, harvesting grain). We used the median hours/time reported for each task in BEEA to convert ‘number of times’ to hours and the median task hours to derive hours for yes/no tasks. We used the ratio of the 75th/25th percentile of exposure estimates as a measure of contrast. We calculated Spearman correlations between the task-specific and total estimates. <h3>Results</h3> Overall, 39% of spouses reported at least one task, with 12% reporting two or more. Swine contact was the most common (27%); milking cows was the least common (3%). We estimated a 90-fold contrast amongst endotoxin-exposed spouses, with 38-, 10-, and 7-fold contrast amongst those exposed to poultry, swine, and milk cows, respectively. The task-specific estimates had low correlation (&lt;0.25) with each other. The ‘total’ (summed) exposure had high correlation with swine contact, moderate correlation with grinding feed and poultry contact, and low correlation with the remaining tasks. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Although we could not account for all bioaerosol-related tasks, we identified substantial endotoxin exposure variability in the AHS spouses. These estimates will be used to examine exposure-response associations in future etiologic analyses with cancer and other outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-epicohabstracts.52
Primary Topic
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8276833 A quantitative algorithm to estimate endotoxin exposure for the spouses in the Agricultural Health Study

Christine G. Parks, Dale P. Sandler, Jonathan N. Hofmann, Melissa C. Friesen et al.
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
article

8276833 A quantitative algorithm to estimate endotoxin exposure for the spouses in the Agricultural Health Study

Christine G. Parks, Dale P. Sandler, Jonathan N. Hofmann, Melissa C. Friesen, Pabitra R Josse, Liang Xie, Gabriella Andreotti
article en

Abstract

<h3>Objective</h3> Agricultural studies mostly focus on farmers’ exposures, but their family members often conduct similar agricultural tasks. To quantify the endotoxin exposure for spouses of farmers in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), we modified an algorithm previously developed for AHS farmers in the Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect in Agriculture (BEEA) sub-study. <h3>Methods</h3> The BEEA algorithm quantified endotoxin exposure for 13 bioaerosol-related agricultural tasks queried via questionnaire. It multiplied task frequency by task-specific intensity derived from meta-analyses of published endotoxin measurements. The AHS enrollment questionnaire completed by 32,345 spouses (&gt;99% female) included 5 of these tasks, three with frequency information (‘number of times’: poultry contact, swine contact, milking cows), and two with yes/no information (grinding feed, harvesting grain). We used the median hours/time reported for each task in BEEA to convert ‘number of times’ to hours and the median task hours to derive hours for yes/no tasks. We used the ratio of the 75th/25th percentile of exposure estimates as a measure of contrast. We calculated Spearman correlations between the task-specific and total estimates. <h3>Results</h3> Overall, 39% of spouses reported at least one task, with 12% reporting two or more. Swine contact was the most common (27%); milking cows was the least common (3%). We estimated a 90-fold contrast amongst endotoxin-exposed spouses, with 38-, 10-, and 7-fold contrast amongst those exposed to poultry, swine, and milk cows, respectively. The task-specific estimates had low correlation (&lt;0.25) with each other. The ‘total’ (summed) exposure had high correlation with swine contact, moderate correlation with grinding feed and poultry contact, and low correlation with the remaining tasks. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Although we could not account for all bioaerosol-related tasks, we identified substantial endotoxin exposure variability in the AHS spouses. These estimates will be used to examine exposure-response associations in future etiologic analyses with cancer and other outcomes.

Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.