8287735 Independent exposure-response analysis of five lung carcinogens and lung cancer risk in a cohort of 2.2 million Ontario workers

<h3>Objectives</h3> Several occupational exposures cause lung cancer, but few studies have examined sex-specific differences. We aim to investigate the independent exposure response effects of exposure to five carcinogens— asbestos, chromium VI, nickel, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and silica — on lung cancer risk. <h3>Methods</h3> A prospective open cohort of Ontario workers was followed for lung cancer diagnoses from 1983 to 2019 in the Ontario Cancer Registry. Exposures were assessed using the Canadian job-exposure matrix, including measures for exposure status (exposed/non-exposed), intensity of exposure (low, medium/high) and frequency of exposure (&lt;8h/week, 8-40h/week, 40+h/week) for each carcinogen. Cox proportional hazards models estimated independent associations of carcinogen exposure and lung cancer risk overall, by sex, and by subtype. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and birth-year. <h3>Results</h3> Overall, 36,125 lung cancer cases were identified among 2,223,408 workers. Exposed workers had significantly higher lung cancer risks for all carcinogens (HR_chomium VI=1.12, 95% CI:1.06–1.18; HR_nickel=1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.10; HR_PAHs=1.18, 95% CI: 1.16–1.21; HR_silica=1.10, 95% CI: 1.06–1.14) except asbestos (HR_asbestos=1.00, 95% CI: 0.97–1.03). Females had higher risks than males for all carcinogens, ranging from 3% (Silica: HR_females=1.12, 95% CI: 0.96–1.31; HR_males=1.09, 95% CI: 1.05–1.13) to 28% (Nickel: HR_females=1.31, 1.10–1.56; HR_males=1.03, 95% CI: 0.99–1.08). Positive exposure-response relationships for exposure frequency and intensity were observed for all carcinogens, with stronger associations among females. Results were similar for adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and small cell lung cancer. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The independent findings are consistent with previous research and highlight potential sex differences in lung cancer risk due to occupational exposure to five carcinogens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-epicohabstracts.360
Primary Topic
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8287735 Independent exposure-response analysis of five lung carcinogens and lung cancer risk in a cohort of 2.2 million Ontario workers

Nathan DeBono, Tanya Navaneelan, Tracy L Kirkham, Jeavana Sritharan et al.
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
article

8287735 Independent exposure-response analysis of five lung carcinogens and lung cancer risk in a cohort of 2.2 million Ontario workers

Nathan DeBono, Tanya Navaneelan, Tracy L Kirkham, Jeavana Sritharan, Paul A. Demers, Fatima Ali, Shannon Halls
article en

Abstract

<h3>Objectives</h3> Several occupational exposures cause lung cancer, but few studies have examined sex-specific differences. We aim to investigate the independent exposure response effects of exposure to five carcinogens— asbestos, chromium VI, nickel, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and silica — on lung cancer risk. <h3>Methods</h3> A prospective open cohort of Ontario workers was followed for lung cancer diagnoses from 1983 to 2019 in the Ontario Cancer Registry. Exposures were assessed using the Canadian job-exposure matrix, including measures for exposure status (exposed/non-exposed), intensity of exposure (low, medium/high) and frequency of exposure (&lt;8h/week, 8-40h/week, 40+h/week) for each carcinogen. Cox proportional hazards models estimated independent associations of carcinogen exposure and lung cancer risk overall, by sex, and by subtype. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and birth-year. <h3>Results</h3> Overall, 36,125 lung cancer cases were identified among 2,223,408 workers. Exposed workers had significantly higher lung cancer risks for all carcinogens (HR_chomium VI=1.12, 95% CI:1.06–1.18; HR_nickel=1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.10; HR_PAHs=1.18, 95% CI: 1.16–1.21; HR_silica=1.10, 95% CI: 1.06–1.14) except asbestos (HR_asbestos=1.00, 95% CI: 0.97–1.03). Females had higher risks than males for all carcinogens, ranging from 3% (Silica: HR_females=1.12, 95% CI: 0.96–1.31; HR_males=1.09, 95% CI: 1.05–1.13) to 28% (Nickel: HR_females=1.31, 1.10–1.56; HR_males=1.03, 95% CI: 0.99–1.08). Positive exposure-response relationships for exposure frequency and intensity were observed for all carcinogens, with stronger associations among females. Results were similar for adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and small cell lung cancer. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The independent findings are consistent with previous research and highlight potential sex differences in lung cancer risk due to occupational exposure to five carcinogens.

Occupational Cancer Research Centre (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.