8263724 Working conditions in low risk nulliparous women and women with multiple pregnancy in The Netherlands: are legislation and guidelines a guarantee for a healthy working environment?

<h3>Objective</h3> This study evaluates whether the working conditions of Dutch women in two different groups, with low risk and with multiple pregnancies, have been adjusted to legislations and the guidelines of The Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB) and the Social Economic Council (SER). <h3>Material and Methods</h3> We performed two prospective cohort studies, in a group women with low risk pregnancies, and another group women with multiple pregnancies. In both groups women with paid work completed three questionnaires concerning demographics, education, general health and working conditions between 10–16 and 20–24 weeks and 30-34 weeks pregnancy. We calculated the proportion of participants with work-related risk factors not in accordance with legislation and/or guidelines. <h3>Results</h3> 50% of working pregnant women with low-risk pregnancies and nearly 60% of women with multiple pregnancies continue to work not in accordance with legislation and guidelines. Many of these women had to deal with physically demanding work, job strain and long and irregular working hours. Successfully implementing MPL and guidelines is a challenge, given the diversity of stakeholders and their interests. The absence of financial incentives for employers, limited access to occupational health care for all working pregnant women and the lack of knowledge and communication about the importance of work adjustment among working pregnant women and their obstetric healthcare providers appear to be the main cause of poor adherence to MPL and guidelines. <h3>Conclusion</h3> 50% of the pregnant women and 60% of women with multiple pregnancies worked under hazardous conditions. Reasons for this limited implementation and areas for improvement are discussed. Given the impact on adverse pregnancy outcomes as well as on the public purse, action to improve compliance must be taken by all stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-epicohabstracts.234
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8263724 Working conditions in low risk nulliparous women and women with multiple pregnancy in The Netherlands: are legislation and guidelines a guarantee for a healthy working environment?

Monique van Beukering, Ben Willem Mol
Healthcare Systems and Practices
article

8263724 Working conditions in low risk nulliparous women and women with multiple pregnancy in The Netherlands: are legislation and guidelines a guarantee for a healthy working environment?

Monique van Beukering, Ben Willem Mol
article en

Abstract

<h3>Objective</h3> This study evaluates whether the working conditions of Dutch women in two different groups, with low risk and with multiple pregnancies, have been adjusted to legislations and the guidelines of The Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB) and the Social Economic Council (SER). <h3>Material and Methods</h3> We performed two prospective cohort studies, in a group women with low risk pregnancies, and another group women with multiple pregnancies. In both groups women with paid work completed three questionnaires concerning demographics, education, general health and working conditions between 10–16 and 20–24 weeks and 30-34 weeks pregnancy. We calculated the proportion of participants with work-related risk factors not in accordance with legislation and/or guidelines. <h3>Results</h3> 50% of working pregnant women with low-risk pregnancies and nearly 60% of women with multiple pregnancies continue to work not in accordance with legislation and guidelines. Many of these women had to deal with physically demanding work, job strain and long and irregular working hours. Successfully implementing MPL and guidelines is a challenge, given the diversity of stakeholders and their interests. The absence of financial incentives for employers, limited access to occupational health care for all working pregnant women and the lack of knowledge and communication about the importance of work adjustment among working pregnant women and their obstetric healthcare providers appear to be the main cause of poor adherence to MPL and guidelines. <h3>Conclusion</h3> 50% of the pregnant women and 60% of women with multiple pregnancies worked under hazardous conditions. Reasons for this limited implementation and areas for improvement are discussed. Given the impact on adverse pregnancy outcomes as well as on the public purse, action to improve compliance must be taken by all stakeholders.

University of Aberdeen (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Healthcare Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.