8189663 The Janus face of burnout: mild complaints versus disorder

<h3></h3> Burnout has two faces. On one side are mild, subclinical symptoms such as fatigue, irritability, and concentration problems—common among employees and requiring preventive action. On the other side is clinical burnout: a severe, disabling condition that requires diagnosis and treatment. Most epidemiological research focuses on mild symptoms, often using inappropriate tools. This has led to inconsistent prevalence rates—ranging, for example, from 0% to 85% in studies on physician burnout.<sup>1</sup> Clinical burnout remains under-researched due to the absence of universally accepted diagnostic criteria. Although burnout is listed in ICD-11 as an ‘occupational phenomenon,’ it is not formally recognized as a medical disorder. In this presentation, I pursue two aims. First, I introduce the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), a validated self-report instrument with established clinical cut-offs. Cross-national research using the BAT shows that rates of mild burnout symptoms vary considerably—from 6.6% in Finland to 25.7% in Japan. Second, I propose diagnostic criteria for clinical burnout. These criteria build on national experiences in Sweden and The Netherlands. Sweden introduced diagnostic criteria for Stress-related Exhaustion Disorder (SED) in 2003. The Netherlandsdeveloped criteria for stress-related disorders, including burnout, in 2000. By combining these approaches, I propose a three-phase diagnostic model that distinguishes (1) early risk, (2) advanced risk, and (3) clinical burnout. This framework helps to bridge the gap between mild complaints and diagnosable disorder. Using the BAT for identifying early symptoms and applying consistent diagnostic criteria for clinical burnout can improve the accuracy of epidemiological research and support more effective prevention and intervention strategies. <h3>Reference</h3> Rotenstein LS Torre M Ramos MA Rosales RC Guille C Sen S Mata DA. Prevalence of burnout among physicians a systematic review. <i>JAMA</i> 2018;<b>320</b>:1131–50.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-epicohabstracts.9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

8189663 The Janus face of burnout: mild complaints versus disorder

Wilmar B. Schaufeli
1 citations
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
2.82
article

8189663 The Janus face of burnout: mild complaints versus disorder

Wilmar B. Schaufeli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h3></h3> Burnout has two faces. On one side are mild, subclinical symptoms such as fatigue, irritability, and concentration problems—common among employees and requiring preventive action. On the other side is clinical burnout: a severe, disabling condition that requires diagnosis and treatment. Most epidemiological research focuses on mild symptoms, often using inappropriate tools. This has led to inconsistent prevalence rates—ranging, for example, from 0% to 85% in studies on physician burnout.<sup>1</sup> Clinical burnout remains under-researched due to the absence of universally accepted diagnostic criteria. Although burnout is listed in ICD-11 as an ‘occupational phenomenon,’ it is not formally recognized as a medical disorder. In this presentation, I pursue two aims. First, I introduce the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), a validated self-report instrument with established clinical cut-offs. Cross-national research using the BAT shows that rates of mild burnout symptoms vary considerably—from 6.6% in Finland to 25.7% in Japan. Second, I propose diagnostic criteria for clinical burnout. These criteria build on national experiences in Sweden and The Netherlands. Sweden introduced diagnostic criteria for Stress-related Exhaustion Disorder (SED) in 2003. The Netherlandsdeveloped criteria for stress-related disorders, including burnout, in 2000. By combining these approaches, I propose a three-phase diagnostic model that distinguishes (1) early risk, (2) advanced risk, and (3) clinical burnout. This framework helps to bridge the gap between mild complaints and diagnosable disorder. Using the BAT for identifying early symptoms and applying consistent diagnostic criteria for clinical burnout can improve the accuracy of epidemiological research and support more effective prevention and intervention strategies. <h3>Reference</h3> Rotenstein LS Torre M Ramos MA Rosales RC Guille C Sen S Mata DA. Prevalence of burnout among physicians a systematic review. <i>JAMA</i> 2018;<b>320</b>:1131–50.

University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.