Continuous difference-in-differences with double/debiased machine learning

SUMMARY This paper extends difference-in-differences (DiD) to settings with continuous treatments. Specifically, the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) at any level of treatment intensity is identified under a conditional parallel trends assumption. Estimating the ATT in this framework requires first estimating infinite-dimensional nuisance parameters, particularly the conditional density of the continuous treatment, which can introduce substantial bias. To address this challenge, we propose estimators for the causal parameters under the double/debiased machine learning framework and establish their asymptotic normality. Additionally, we provide consistent variance estimators and construct uniform confidence bands based on a multiplier bootstrap procedure. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we revisit a previous study on the 1983 Medicare Prospective Payment System reform, reframing it as a DiD with continuous treatment and non-parametrically estimating its effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Econometrics Journal
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf024
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuous difference-in-differences with double/debiased machine learning

Lucas Zheng Zhang
Econometrics Journal
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Continuous difference-in-differences with double/debiased machine learning

Lucas Zheng Zhang
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY This paper extends difference-in-differences (DiD) to settings with continuous treatments. Specifically, the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) at any level of treatment intensity is identified under a conditional parallel trends assumption. Estimating the ATT in this framework requires first estimating infinite-dimensional nuisance parameters, particularly the conditional density of the continuous treatment, which can introduce substantial bias. To address this challenge, we propose estimators for the causal parameters under the double/debiased machine learning framework and establish their asymptotic normality. Additionally, we provide consistent variance estimators and construct uniform confidence bands based on a multiplier bootstrap procedure. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we revisit a previous study on the 1983 Medicare Prospective Payment System reform, reframing it as a DiD with continuous treatment and non-parametrically estimating its effects.

Econometrics Journal
University of California, Los Angeles (US), The White House (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.