IMPLEMENTATION AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF NON-EQUIVALENT BIAXIAL MEASUREMENTS FOR HYPERELASTIC MATERIALS

In the case of hyperelastic material models, it is not possible to reliably fit the parameters of the constitutive model to general load cases from a single set of uniaxial measurements. In order to obtain a more accurate model, different measurements are used, but these are very complex and difficult to perform in most cases. The most commonly used measurement datasets for fitting are data from uniaxial and biaxial tensile tests and constrained uniaxial loading (planar tension), but due to the complexity of the measurement implementation, fitting is often done with less data. It can be seen that the stress-strain relationship obtained for the uniaxial and equibiaxial test cases envelops the case of planar tension from two sides, the application of which helps to define a better material model. Treloar’s dataset also describes three different cases of experiments, in which the results of these tensile experiments were analysed. However, if we perform biaxial measurements and can control the displacements along the two axes independently, we may be able to generate a new dataset that is neither uniaxial nor equibiaxial measurement data, this dataset describes an intermediate state. This way, we are also able to make other types of measurements in the same measurement setup, which can lead to a more accurate result when fitting a material model.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46793/41das2025.007h
Primary Topic
Elasticity and Material Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPLEMENTATION AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF NON-EQUIVALENT BIAXIAL MEASUREMENTS FOR HYPERELASTIC MATERIALS

Attila Kossa, Kristóf Havasi
Elasticity and Material Modeling
article

IMPLEMENTATION AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF NON-EQUIVALENT BIAXIAL MEASUREMENTS FOR HYPERELASTIC MATERIALS

Attila Kossa, Kristóf Havasi
article en

Abstract

In the case of hyperelastic material models, it is not possible to reliably fit the parameters of the constitutive model to general load cases from a single set of uniaxial measurements. In order to obtain a more accurate model, different measurements are used, but these are very complex and difficult to perform in most cases. The most commonly used measurement datasets for fitting are data from uniaxial and biaxial tensile tests and constrained uniaxial loading (planar tension), but due to the complexity of the measurement implementation, fitting is often done with less data. It can be seen that the stress-strain relationship obtained for the uniaxial and equibiaxial test cases envelops the case of planar tension from two sides, the application of which helps to define a better material model. Treloar’s dataset also describes three different cases of experiments, in which the results of these tensile experiments were analysed. However, if we perform biaxial measurements and can control the displacements along the two axes independently, we may be able to generate a new dataset that is neither uniaxial nor equibiaxial measurement data, this dataset describes an intermediate state. This way, we are also able to make other types of measurements in the same measurement setup, which can lead to a more accurate result when fitting a material model.

Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem, Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, National Research, Development and Innovation Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Elasticity and Material Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.