Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion/Recovery Scale (OFER) and Health and Well-Being Outcomes for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review

This article presents a systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA standards, considering Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and APA PsycArticles databases. The aim of the review was to systematize recent scientific evidence regarding relationships emerged in the literature between the different dimensions of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery Scale (OFER) and measures of health/well-being/burnout. From 524 records, 13 papers were included. Acute fatigue and Chronic fatigue were inversely associated with well-being and health outcomes: life and job satisfaction, meaning in work, quality of life, physical and mental health, and directly associated with job dissatisfaction and burnout. Conversely, Intershift Recovery was positively associated with life and job satisfaction, meaning in work, quality of life, physical and mental health, and inversely with job dissatisfaction and burnout. These findings open future perspectives for research and intervention for sustainable development, answering to the challenges of Sustainable Development Goal 3 “Good Health and Well-being”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Career Development
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162251383226
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion/Recovery Scale (OFER) and Health and Well-Being Outcomes for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review

Letizia Palazzeschi
Australian Journal of Career Development
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion/Recovery Scale (OFER) and Health and Well-Being Outcomes for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review

Letizia Palazzeschi
article en

Abstract

This article presents a systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA standards, considering Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and APA PsycArticles databases. The aim of the review was to systematize recent scientific evidence regarding relationships emerged in the literature between the different dimensions of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery Scale (OFER) and measures of health/well-being/burnout. From 524 records, 13 papers were included. Acute fatigue and Chronic fatigue were inversely associated with well-being and health outcomes: life and job satisfaction, meaning in work, quality of life, physical and mental health, and directly associated with job dissatisfaction and burnout. Conversely, Intershift Recovery was positively associated with life and job satisfaction, meaning in work, quality of life, physical and mental health, and inversely with job dissatisfaction and burnout. These findings open future perspectives for research and intervention for sustainable development, answering to the challenges of Sustainable Development Goal 3 “Good Health and Well-being”.

Australian Journal of Career DevelopmentVol. 34(3)
University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.