A Jacobian‐Free Newton‐Krylov Method for Cell‐Centred Finite Volume Solid Mechanics

ABSTRACT This study proposes a Jacobian‐free Newton‐Krylov approach for finite‐volume solid mechanics. Traditional Newton‐based approaches require explicit Jacobian matrix formation and storage, which can be computationally expensive and memory‐intensive. In contrast, Jacobian‐free Newton‐Krylov methods approximate the Jacobian's action using finite differences, combined with Krylov subspace solvers such as the generalised minimal residual method (GMRES), enabling seamless integration into existing segregated finite‐volume frameworks without major code refactoring. This work proposes and benchmarks the performance of a compact‐stencil Jacobian‐free Newton‐Krylov method against a conventional segregated approach on a suite of test cases that span varying geometric dimensions, nonlinearities, dynamic responses and material behaviours. Key metrics, including computational cost, memory efficiency and robustness, are evaluated, along with the influence of preconditioning strategies and stabilisation scaling. Results show that the proposed Jacobian‐free Newton‐Krylov method outperforms the segregated approach in all linear and nonlinear elastic cases, achieving order‐of‐magnitude speedups in many instances; however, divergence is observed in elastoplastic cases, highlighting areas for further development. It is found that preconditioning choice affects performance: a LU direct solver is fastest for small to moderately sized cases, while a multigrid method is more effective for larger problems. The findings demonstrate that Jacobian‐free Newton‐Krylov methods are promising for advancing finite‐volume solid mechanics simulations, particularly for existing segregated frameworks where minimal modifications enable their adoption. The described implementations are available in the solids4foam toolbox for OpenFOAM, inviting the community to explore, extend and compare these procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.70268
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Jacobian‐Free Newton‐Krylov Method for Cell‐Centred Finite Volume Solid Mechanics

Philip Cardiff, Željko Tuković, Ivan Batistić, Dylan Armfield
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
article

A Jacobian‐Free Newton‐Krylov Method for Cell‐Centred Finite Volume Solid Mechanics

Philip Cardiff, Željko Tuković, Ivan Batistić, Dylan Armfield
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study proposes a Jacobian‐free Newton‐Krylov approach for finite‐volume solid mechanics. Traditional Newton‐based approaches require explicit Jacobian matrix formation and storage, which can be computationally expensive and memory‐intensive. In contrast, Jacobian‐free Newton‐Krylov methods approximate the Jacobian's action using finite differences, combined with Krylov subspace solvers such as the generalised minimal residual method (GMRES), enabling seamless integration into existing segregated finite‐volume frameworks without major code refactoring. This work proposes and benchmarks the performance of a compact‐stencil Jacobian‐free Newton‐Krylov method against a conventional segregated approach on a suite of test cases that span varying geometric dimensions, nonlinearities, dynamic responses and material behaviours. Key metrics, including computational cost, memory efficiency and robustness, are evaluated, along with the influence of preconditioning strategies and stabilisation scaling. Results show that the proposed Jacobian‐free Newton‐Krylov method outperforms the segregated approach in all linear and nonlinear elastic cases, achieving order‐of‐magnitude speedups in many instances; however, divergence is observed in elastoplastic cases, highlighting areas for further development. It is found that preconditioning choice affects performance: a LU direct solver is fastest for small to moderately sized cases, while a multigrid method is more effective for larger problems. The findings demonstrate that Jacobian‐free Newton‐Krylov methods are promising for advancing finite‐volume solid mechanics simulations, particularly for existing segregated frameworks where minimal modifications enable their adoption. The described implementations are available in the solids4foam toolbox for OpenFOAM, inviting the community to explore, extend and compare these procedures.

International Journal for Numerical Methods in EngineeringVol. 127(3)
University College Dublin (IE), University of Zagreb (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.