Ontological critique of transhumanism

When philosophy and special sciences deal with human beings, it is necessary to take into account the objective qualitative characteristics of the social substratum. Nevertheless, contrary to this requirement, the ontology of transhumanism has an anti-essentialist and anti-substantial character. The transhumanist “principle of system's isofunctionalism” is in fact fully applicable only to systems of one level of complexity, and a system of a simpler level cannot reflect without significant losses the information of a system of a more complex level, which makes it impossible to accurately “write” a human personality into a computer. Any attempt to transfer a part of proper human functions to artificial models created from natural elements is impoverishment of a human being, destruction of human essence. Besides, the human body is formed in the course of the infinite process of matter development, so artificial intervention in the human bodily structure, based on always historically finite scientific knowledge, every time risks not taking into account some important circumstances for the normal functioning of corporeality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of Omsk University
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24147/1812-3996.2025.3.16-24
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ontological critique of transhumanism

Yuri V. Loskutov
1 citations
Herald of Omsk University
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
1.43
article

Ontological critique of transhumanism

Yuri V. Loskutov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

When philosophy and special sciences deal with human beings, it is necessary to take into account the objective qualitative characteristics of the social substratum. Nevertheless, contrary to this requirement, the ontology of transhumanism has an anti-essentialist and anti-substantial character. The transhumanist “principle of system's isofunctionalism” is in fact fully applicable only to systems of one level of complexity, and a system of a simpler level cannot reflect without significant losses the information of a system of a more complex level, which makes it impossible to accurately “write” a human personality into a computer. Any attempt to transfer a part of proper human functions to artificial models created from natural elements is impoverishment of a human being, destruction of human essence. Besides, the human body is formed in the course of the infinite process of matter development, so artificial intervention in the human bodily structure, based on always historically finite scientific knowledge, every time risks not taking into account some important circumstances for the normal functioning of corporeality.

Herald of Omsk UniversityVol. 30(3)
Perm State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.