NFTs and Intellectual Property: Addressing Legal Certainty for Consumer Protection

This paper aims to provide a view regarding NFT transactions in the future to provide legal certainty, especially for IPR by using normative research methods along with supporting theories to find that in fact NFT transactions in Indonesia are far from legal because they do not meet the rules of NFT transactions where PTSE regulations, especially NFT transactions, do not provide legal guarantees to their owners, one of which is the chain of suppliers, namely Opensea, which is not yet optimal, so there is a need for regulations or crypto exchanges, especially NFTs, which not only provide certainty but the crypto market in Indonesia does not experience scams because in terms of analysis NFTs can be categorized as inherity distinctives or as signs that inherently have distinguishing power, immediately if they get protection through use, because some parties often cheat by taking screenshots, but for parties who make legitimate transactions, they have a differentiating way of gaining access to increasing the digitalization of works has reduced the potential value of copyright scarcity, which has become a significant problem in copyright disputes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
rechtenstudent
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v5i2.305
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NFTs and Intellectual Property: Addressing Legal Certainty for Consumer Protection

Nuzulia Kumala Sari, Alif Ardiansyah
rechtenstudent
Intellectual Property Law
article

NFTs and Intellectual Property: Addressing Legal Certainty for Consumer Protection

Nuzulia Kumala Sari, Alif Ardiansyah
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a view regarding NFT transactions in the future to provide legal certainty, especially for IPR by using normative research methods along with supporting theories to find that in fact NFT transactions in Indonesia are far from legal because they do not meet the rules of NFT transactions where PTSE regulations, especially NFT transactions, do not provide legal guarantees to their owners, one of which is the chain of suppliers, namely Opensea, which is not yet optimal, so there is a need for regulations or crypto exchanges, especially NFTs, which not only provide certainty but the crypto market in Indonesia does not experience scams because in terms of analysis NFTs can be categorized as inherity distinctives or as signs that inherently have distinguishing power, immediately if they get protection through use, because some parties often cheat by taking screenshots, but for parties who make legitimate transactions, they have a differentiating way of gaining access to increasing the digitalization of works has reduced the potential value of copyright scarcity, which has become a significant problem in copyright disputes.

rechtenstudentVol. 5(2)
Universitas Jember (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

NFTs and Intellectual Property: Addressing Legal Certainty for Consumer Protection — Nuzulia Kumala Sari, Alif Ardiansyah · rechtenstudent (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS