Downside Risk Measurement of Indonesian Financial and Energy Securities: A Value at Risk Perspective

This study explores the measurement of downside risk in the Indonesian capital market by applying Value at Risk (VaR) analysis to two representative companies from different economic sectors: PT Asuransi Bina Dana Arta Tbk (ABDA), an insurance firm, and PT ABM Investama Tbk (ABMI), an energy and mining company. Utilizing daily return data from December 2023 to November 2024, we assess both individual and portfolio-level risk profiles through a quantitative framework based on Monte Carlo simulation. Our findings reveal distinct risk-return characteristics between the two stocks. ABDA exhibits a negative average daily return (-0.15%) with relatively low volatility (standard deviation of 1.12%), whereas ABMI shows a positive expected return (0.07%) but higher variability (standard deviation of 2.06%). Interestingly, despite its lower volatility, ABDA records higher VaR values across all confidence levels, indicating greater downside exposure—particularly evident at the 95% confidence level where ABDA's one-day VaR is -2.04%, compared to ABMI’s -1.77%. A cross-sector portfolio consisting of 40% ABDA and 60% ABMI demonstrates meaningful diversification benefits, reducing the standard deviation to 1.02% and improving the VaR to -1.54%. This represents a risk reduction of 24.5% compared to ABDA alone and 13% relative to ABMI alone. For a hypothetical investment of IDR 100 million, these improvements equate to reduced potential daily losses of IDR 508,258 and IDR 233,504 respectively. The results emphasize that strategic cross-sector allocation—even within a simple two-asset portfolio—can significantly enhance risk-adjusted performance in emerging markets like Indonesia. By combining financial and energy assets with differing sensitivities to macroeconomic conditions, investors can better manage downside risk while maintaining exposure to diverse economic drivers. This research provides a practical methodology for risk assessment and portfolio construction, offering valuable insights for asset managers and decision-makers operating in volatile and multi-sector investment environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Science Engineering Technology and Education
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.asci3898
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Downside Risk Measurement of Indonesian Financial and Energy Securities: A Value at Risk Perspective

Zahara Tussoleha Rony, Ana Rusmardiana, Zokir Toshtemirovich Mamadiyarov, Susatyo Adhi Pramono et al.
Journal of Applied Science Engineering Technology and Education
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Downside Risk Measurement of Indonesian Financial and Energy Securities: A Value at Risk Perspective

Zahara Tussoleha Rony, Ana Rusmardiana, Zokir Toshtemirovich Mamadiyarov, Susatyo Adhi Pramono, Riny Jefri
article en

Abstract

This study explores the measurement of downside risk in the Indonesian capital market by applying Value at Risk (VaR) analysis to two representative companies from different economic sectors: PT Asuransi Bina Dana Arta Tbk (ABDA), an insurance firm, and PT ABM Investama Tbk (ABMI), an energy and mining company. Utilizing daily return data from December 2023 to November 2024, we assess both individual and portfolio-level risk profiles through a quantitative framework based on Monte Carlo simulation. Our findings reveal distinct risk-return characteristics between the two stocks. ABDA exhibits a negative average daily return (-0.15%) with relatively low volatility (standard deviation of 1.12%), whereas ABMI shows a positive expected return (0.07%) but higher variability (standard deviation of 2.06%). Interestingly, despite its lower volatility, ABDA records higher VaR values across all confidence levels, indicating greater downside exposure—particularly evident at the 95% confidence level where ABDA's one-day VaR is -2.04%, compared to ABMI’s -1.77%. A cross-sector portfolio consisting of 40% ABDA and 60% ABMI demonstrates meaningful diversification benefits, reducing the standard deviation to 1.02% and improving the VaR to -1.54%. This represents a risk reduction of 24.5% compared to ABDA alone and 13% relative to ABMI alone. For a hypothetical investment of IDR 100 million, these improvements equate to reduced potential daily losses of IDR 508,258 and IDR 233,504 respectively. The results emphasize that strategic cross-sector allocation—even within a simple two-asset portfolio—can significantly enhance risk-adjusted performance in emerging markets like Indonesia. By combining financial and energy assets with differing sensitivities to macroeconomic conditions, investors can better manage downside risk while maintaining exposure to diverse economic drivers. This research provides a practical methodology for risk assessment and portfolio construction, offering valuable insights for asset managers and decision-makers operating in volatile and multi-sector investment environments.

Journal of Applied Science Engineering Technology and EducationVol. 7(2)
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI (ID), Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya (ID), Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto (ID), Termez State University (UZ), State University of Makassar (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.