Market-Economic Decentralization and Governance in Hargeisa Local Government, Somaliland

This study investigates the relationship between market-economic decentralization and governance within the Hargeisa Local Government in Somaliland. Market-economic decentralization, influenced by neoliberal principles, involves transferring decision-making authority to local levels to stimulate private sector engagement and economic efficiency. Despite comprehensive decentralization reforms initiated in 2001, Hargeisa continues to confront significant governance challenges, including institutional weaknesses, fiscal mismanagement, and corruption. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this research integrates quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews with 269 local officials to assess the impact of decentralization on key governance indicators: accountability, transparency, and e-governance. The results demonstrate strong positive correlations between market-economic decentralization and improved governance outcomes (r = 0.670–0.678, p < 0.01). Regression analysis further indicates that decentralization accounts for 60% of the variance in governance performance (β = 0.778, p < 0.001), with fiscal autonomy, public-private partnerships (PPPs), and foreign direct investment (FDI) identified as critical factors. Nevertheless, persistent obstacles such as heavy fiscal dependence (80% on central transfers), gender imbalances (60.2% male workforce), elite capture, and divergent public perceptions on privatization curtail the full potential of decentralization. These findings resonate with the Soufflé Theory, emphasizing the need for balanced political, fiscal, and administrative integration, and the Principal-Agent Theory, which highlights accountability gaps. The study concludes that while decentralization enhances governance, its efficacy is moderated by contextual and institutional factors. It advocates for complementary strategies, including capacity building, gender-inclusive policies, transparent investment frameworks, and digital governance, to maximize decentralization benefits in fragile states like Somaliland.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BISNIS & BIROKRASI Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v32i3.1610
Primary Topic
European Monetary and Fiscal Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Market-Economic Decentralization and Governance in Hargeisa Local Government, Somaliland

B Benjamin, Mustafe Mahamoud Abdillahi.
BISNIS & BIROKRASI Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi
European Monetary and Fiscal Policies
article

Market-Economic Decentralization and Governance in Hargeisa Local Government, Somaliland

B Benjamin, Mustafe Mahamoud Abdillahi.
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between market-economic decentralization and governance within the Hargeisa Local Government in Somaliland. Market-economic decentralization, influenced by neoliberal principles, involves transferring decision-making authority to local levels to stimulate private sector engagement and economic efficiency. Despite comprehensive decentralization reforms initiated in 2001, Hargeisa continues to confront significant governance challenges, including institutional weaknesses, fiscal mismanagement, and corruption. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this research integrates quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews with 269 local officials to assess the impact of decentralization on key governance indicators: accountability, transparency, and e-governance. The results demonstrate strong positive correlations between market-economic decentralization and improved governance outcomes (r = 0.670–0.678, p < 0.01). Regression analysis further indicates that decentralization accounts for 60% of the variance in governance performance (β = 0.778, p < 0.001), with fiscal autonomy, public-private partnerships (PPPs), and foreign direct investment (FDI) identified as critical factors. Nevertheless, persistent obstacles such as heavy fiscal dependence (80% on central transfers), gender imbalances (60.2% male workforce), elite capture, and divergent public perceptions on privatization curtail the full potential of decentralization. These findings resonate with the Soufflé Theory, emphasizing the need for balanced political, fiscal, and administrative integration, and the Principal-Agent Theory, which highlights accountability gaps. The study concludes that while decentralization enhances governance, its efficacy is moderated by contextual and institutional factors. It advocates for complementary strategies, including capacity building, gender-inclusive policies, transparent investment frameworks, and digital governance, to maximize decentralization benefits in fragile states like Somaliland.

BISNIS & BIROKRASI Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan OrganisasiVol. 32(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
European Monetary and Fiscal Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.