THEORY OF THE ISSUE OF JUDICIAL LAWMAKING AND NORMATIVE RESOLUTIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

Significant progress in artificial intelligence technologies expands development opportunities in many areas of public life, but at the same time creates security threats, including when AI processes personal data. The article examines the legal aspects of regulating the protection of personal data in the context of the development of artificial intelligence, analyzes foreign experience in ensuring confidentiality and assesses the current state of legal protection of personal data in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The study is based on a comparative legal analysis of the legislation of the EU, USA, China and Kazakhstan in the field of personal data protection and AI regulation, and analyzes the differences in law enforcement and the degree of recognition of the right to privacy in these jurisdictions. In the EU, personal data is regulated under the GDPR, which views its protection as an inalienable right of the individual. In the United States, the approach is less unified and is determined at the state level, which leads to fragmentation of legal regulation. China, by contrast, controls data processing from a national security perspective, which limits the scope of citizens' rights to protect their personal data. The article identifies key issues in law enforcement practice in the Republic of Kazakhstan, including the lack of constitutional recognition of the right to personal data protection, insufficient regulation of automated decision-making, and the lack of a mechanism for the “right to an explanation” of decisions made by AI. Measures are proposed to improve the legal regulation of privacy protection, including the introduction of legal norms that ensure the explainability of AI decisions, strengthening the protection of personal data in automated systems, and harmonizing national norms with international standards. The results obtained can be used to improve the legislation of Kazakhstan in the field of AI and personal data, as well as for further research in the field of legal regulation of digital technologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52026/2788-5291_2025_80_3_38
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THEORY OF THE ISSUE OF JUDICIAL LAWMAKING AND NORMATIVE RESOLUTIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

Botagoz Aspandyarovna Umitchinova, Galina Anatolyevna Menzyuk, Yuliya Gavrilova
Bulletin of Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan
European and International Law Studies
article

THEORY OF THE ISSUE OF JUDICIAL LAWMAKING AND NORMATIVE RESOLUTIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

Botagoz Aspandyarovna Umitchinova, Galina Anatolyevna Menzyuk, Yuliya Gavrilova
article en

Abstract

Significant progress in artificial intelligence technologies expands development opportunities in many areas of public life, but at the same time creates security threats, including when AI processes personal data. The article examines the legal aspects of regulating the protection of personal data in the context of the development of artificial intelligence, analyzes foreign experience in ensuring confidentiality and assesses the current state of legal protection of personal data in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The study is based on a comparative legal analysis of the legislation of the EU, USA, China and Kazakhstan in the field of personal data protection and AI regulation, and analyzes the differences in law enforcement and the degree of recognition of the right to privacy in these jurisdictions. In the EU, personal data is regulated under the GDPR, which views its protection as an inalienable right of the individual. In the United States, the approach is less unified and is determined at the state level, which leads to fragmentation of legal regulation. China, by contrast, controls data processing from a national security perspective, which limits the scope of citizens' rights to protect their personal data. The article identifies key issues in law enforcement practice in the Republic of Kazakhstan, including the lack of constitutional recognition of the right to personal data protection, insufficient regulation of automated decision-making, and the lack of a mechanism for the “right to an explanation” of decisions made by AI. Measures are proposed to improve the legal regulation of privacy protection, including the introduction of legal norms that ensure the explainability of AI decisions, strengthening the protection of personal data in automated systems, and harmonizing national norms with international standards. The results obtained can be used to improve the legislation of Kazakhstan in the field of AI and personal data, as well as for further research in the field of legal regulation of digital technologies.

Bulletin of Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of KazakhstanVol. 80(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.