Rekonstruksi Restoratif Justice Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi: Membangun Keadilan Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045

The urgency of this research is highly necessary in order to alter the paradigm of corruption criminalisation based on punishment towards recovery. The formulation of the problem in this research is whether the shift in the spirit of corruption criminalization from retributive justice to restorative justice can guarantee the realisation of national economic recovery towards the Indonesia Emas 2045 vision and how the reconstruction of restorative justice through the approach of categorizing state losses in the criminalization system in Indonesia. This research uses a normative legal research type that is prescriptive. The results of this study indicated that (1) The teachings of retributive justice in legal practice in other countries such as the Netherlands have been abandoned and adopted the teachings of restorative justice. This teaching is in line with the ideology of Pancasila, so it is very important to be applied in the corruption criminalization system in Indonesia. (2) Restorative justice reconstruction based on state loss categories includes: Category 1 state losses below 200 million plus 1/4, Category 2 state losses of at least 200 million to a maximum of 1 billion plus 1/3, Category 3 state losses of at least 1 billion and a maximum of 5 billion plus 1/2, Category 4 state losses of 5 billion but not more than 100 billion plus 2/3, Category 5 state losses above 100 billion plus 100%. This study concluded that the restorative justice categorisation approach in handling corruption cases will realize efforts to restore the national economy towards the Indonesia Emas 2045 vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL HUKUM IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss2.art9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rekonstruksi Restoratif Justice Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi: Membangun Keadilan Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045

Handrawan Handrawan, Fuad Nur, Fitriah Faisal, Aman Pratama
2 citations
JURNAL HUKUM IUS QUIA IUSTUM
Legal Studies and Policies
31.97
article

Rekonstruksi Restoratif Justice Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi: Membangun Keadilan Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045

Handrawan Handrawan, Fuad Nur, Fitriah Faisal, Aman Pratama
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The urgency of this research is highly necessary in order to alter the paradigm of corruption criminalisation based on punishment towards recovery. The formulation of the problem in this research is whether the shift in the spirit of corruption criminalization from retributive justice to restorative justice can guarantee the realisation of national economic recovery towards the Indonesia Emas 2045 vision and how the reconstruction of restorative justice through the approach of categorizing state losses in the criminalization system in Indonesia. This research uses a normative legal research type that is prescriptive. The results of this study indicated that (1) The teachings of retributive justice in legal practice in other countries such as the Netherlands have been abandoned and adopted the teachings of restorative justice. This teaching is in line with the ideology of Pancasila, so it is very important to be applied in the corruption criminalization system in Indonesia. (2) Restorative justice reconstruction based on state loss categories includes: Category 1 state losses below 200 million plus 1/4, Category 2 state losses of at least 200 million to a maximum of 1 billion plus 1/3, Category 3 state losses of at least 1 billion and a maximum of 5 billion plus 1/2, Category 4 state losses of 5 billion but not more than 100 billion plus 2/3, Category 5 state losses above 100 billion plus 100%. This study concluded that the restorative justice categorisation approach in handling corruption cases will realize efforts to restore the national economy towards the Indonesia Emas 2045 vision.

JURNAL HUKUM IUS QUIA IUSTUMVol. 32(2)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), Universitas Halu Oleo (ID), Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Legal Studies and Policies
31.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.