Evaluating industrial exoskeletons for performance and fatigue in lifting tasks

Abstract Repetitive movements and awkward postures in construction work often lead to muscle fatigue and work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), contributing to reduced productivity and heightened occupational risks. As Industry 5.0 emphasises human-centric technologies, this study evaluates two back support exoskeleton designs – HAPO SD (springbased) and BISKO (elastic textile) – in a repetitive lifting task. Using an exploratory single-case study methodology, six trials were conducted over 18 days, with each trial including three sets of repetitive lifting using a 24 kg kettlebell under three conditions: (1) no exoskeleton, (2) HAPO SD, and (3) BISKO. Performance was measured through repetition count, time per repetition, and user experience. Results showed that the HAPO SD system achieved a 120%–162% increase in repetitions compared with no exoskeleton and outperformed BISKO by 7%–58%. Both systems demonstrated reduced time per repetition and lower standard deviations versus the control condition, indicating enhanced endurance stability. HAPO SD provided superior lifting support, while BISKO offered better ease of use and adjustability. Although the single-case design and controlled environment of this study warrant further investigation in actual construction settings and with larger sample sizes, the findings suggest that exoskeleton adoption could improve worker productivity and reduce WMSD risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization Technology and Management in Construction An International Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2025-0012
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating industrial exoskeletons for performance and fatigue in lifting tasks

Søren Wandahl, Mohamad Iyad Al‐Khiami, Søren Munch Lindhard
Organization Technology and Management in Construction An International Journal
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Evaluating industrial exoskeletons for performance and fatigue in lifting tasks

Søren Wandahl, Mohamad Iyad Al‐Khiami, Søren Munch Lindhard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Repetitive movements and awkward postures in construction work often lead to muscle fatigue and work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), contributing to reduced productivity and heightened occupational risks. As Industry 5.0 emphasises human-centric technologies, this study evaluates two back support exoskeleton designs – HAPO SD (springbased) and BISKO (elastic textile) – in a repetitive lifting task. Using an exploratory single-case study methodology, six trials were conducted over 18 days, with each trial including three sets of repetitive lifting using a 24 kg kettlebell under three conditions: (1) no exoskeleton, (2) HAPO SD, and (3) BISKO. Performance was measured through repetition count, time per repetition, and user experience. Results showed that the HAPO SD system achieved a 120%–162% increase in repetitions compared with no exoskeleton and outperformed BISKO by 7%–58%. Both systems demonstrated reduced time per repetition and lower standard deviations versus the control condition, indicating enhanced endurance stability. HAPO SD provided superior lifting support, while BISKO offered better ease of use and adjustability. Although the single-case design and controlled environment of this study warrant further investigation in actual construction settings and with larger sample sizes, the findings suggest that exoskeleton adoption could improve worker productivity and reduce WMSD risk.

Organization Technology and Management in Construction An International JournalVol. 17(1)
Aarhus University (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.