Deriving the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity of Ontario Cities and Rural Areas

Background: This original research article presents the first city-scaled accounts of ecological footprint and biocapacity applied to all 577 census subdivisions in Ontario, Canada. These new data relates local consumption of materials and energy, and the production of emissions, to the area of ecosystems used within and outside the same local jurisdictions to support this metabolism. This information can inform many stakeholders understanding of sustainable prosperity in cities and rural areas, which are challenged by complex geographies of supply chains, waste streams, and the jurisdictions in which policies are made or applied. Methods: Local accounts of ecological footprint were generated by integrating census data with provincial-scaled accounts of investment and consumption of goods and services by households and governments, and coefficients relating economic outputs to areas of ecosystems providing economic inputs. Biocapacity was generated by relating land cover and land use data at 15 m of resolution to its potential to support a footprint component. Results: Ecological footprint varies tremendously between and among cities and rural areas in Ontario, from 12 to 0.12 global hectares (gha) per capita (gha/capita). Differences relate to population, household income, commuting durations and modal split, housing types, and average household size. Biocapacity ranged from 10,039 to 0.11 gha/capita within local boundaries. Conclusions: These new and publicly available data can inform opportunities to conserve or enhance biocapacity, and to understand the potential and limitations of local efforts to affect ecological footprints. These are discussed and contextualized within an ecological economics framework of sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of city climate policy and economy
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jccpe-2024-0058
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deriving the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity of Ontario Cities and Rural Areas

Danielle Letang, E. Willard Miller, Peri Dworatzek
Journal of city climate policy and economy
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Deriving the Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity of Ontario Cities and Rural Areas

Danielle Letang, E. Willard Miller, Peri Dworatzek
article en

Abstract

Background: This original research article presents the first city-scaled accounts of ecological footprint and biocapacity applied to all 577 census subdivisions in Ontario, Canada. These new data relates local consumption of materials and energy, and the production of emissions, to the area of ecosystems used within and outside the same local jurisdictions to support this metabolism. This information can inform many stakeholders understanding of sustainable prosperity in cities and rural areas, which are challenged by complex geographies of supply chains, waste streams, and the jurisdictions in which policies are made or applied. Methods: Local accounts of ecological footprint were generated by integrating census data with provincial-scaled accounts of investment and consumption of goods and services by households and governments, and coefficients relating economic outputs to areas of ecosystems providing economic inputs. Biocapacity was generated by relating land cover and land use data at 15 m of resolution to its potential to support a footprint component. Results: Ecological footprint varies tremendously between and among cities and rural areas in Ontario, from 12 to 0.12 global hectares (gha) per capita (gha/capita). Differences relate to population, household income, commuting durations and modal split, housing types, and average household size. Biocapacity ranged from 10,039 to 0.11 gha/capita within local boundaries. Conclusions: These new and publicly available data can inform opportunities to conserve or enhance biocapacity, and to understand the potential and limitations of local efforts to affect ecological footprints. These are discussed and contextualized within an ecological economics framework of sustainability.

Journal of city climate policy and economyVol. 4(2)
York University (CA), GreenField Specialty Alcolhols (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.