Qualitative Exploration of Causal Factors Influencing the Divorce Process Based on the Lived Experiences of Divorced Couples

Divorce, as one of the most serious social and psychological challenges, has extensive consequences for individuals, families, and society. Identifying the causal factors contributing to the divorce process can help achieve a deeper understanding of this phenomenon and provide preventive strategies. The present study aimed to qualitatively examine the causal factors influencing the emergence of the divorce process based on the lived experiences of divorced couples. The study employed a qualitative method using semi-structured interviews. The interviews continued until data saturation was reached, and 10 couples were interviewed. To enrich the data, both broad and probing questions were used. After data collection, the data were analyzed through thematic analysis. To ensure the trustworthiness and validity of the findings, the four criteria proposed by Lincoln and Guba (credibility, transferability, confirmability, and dependability) were employed, including participant checking, confirmation by academic supervisors and advisors, external auditing of the data analysis, and purposeful sampling of participants with diverse experiences. The findings indicated that the causal conditions contributing to divorce in the lived experiences of the studied couples resulted from a complex interplay of cultural, psychological, and social factors. Data analysis showed that dysfunctional family patterns and the intergenerational transmission of maladaptive schemas, the symbolic gender system and traditional beliefs about the roles of men and women, difficulties in emotion regulation and a lack of psychological literacy, strong dependency on the family of origin and interference by relatives, hasty marriages and uninformed partner selection, and dysfunctional marital beliefs were among the most significant causal conditions. Moreover, factors such as marital infidelity, lack of physical attractiveness, and neglect of personal care were highlighted in the couples’ narratives as the ultimate indicators of emotional and psychological disengagement. The analytical synthesis of the study suggests that causality in the divorce process is not a single-factor phenomenon but rather a complex overlap of three levels of causality: structural causality (gender attitudes and cultural pressures), psychological causality (lack of emotional and communication skills), and intergenerational causality (transmission of damaging family patterns). Ultimately, divorce in the cultural context of Shiraz reflects the tension between entrenched traditions and contemporary needs for an egalitarian, emotionally supportive, and dialogue-based relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mental Health and Lifestyle Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/mhlj.3.4.9
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative Exploration of Causal Factors Influencing the Divorce Process Based on the Lived Experiences of Divorced Couples

Majid Barzegar, Maryam Kouroshnia, Hossein Baghooli, Mitra Kerdegar
Mental Health and Lifestyle Journal
Family Dynamics and Relationships
article

Qualitative Exploration of Causal Factors Influencing the Divorce Process Based on the Lived Experiences of Divorced Couples

Majid Barzegar, Maryam Kouroshnia, Hossein Baghooli, Mitra Kerdegar
article en

Abstract

Divorce, as one of the most serious social and psychological challenges, has extensive consequences for individuals, families, and society. Identifying the causal factors contributing to the divorce process can help achieve a deeper understanding of this phenomenon and provide preventive strategies. The present study aimed to qualitatively examine the causal factors influencing the emergence of the divorce process based on the lived experiences of divorced couples. The study employed a qualitative method using semi-structured interviews. The interviews continued until data saturation was reached, and 10 couples were interviewed. To enrich the data, both broad and probing questions were used. After data collection, the data were analyzed through thematic analysis. To ensure the trustworthiness and validity of the findings, the four criteria proposed by Lincoln and Guba (credibility, transferability, confirmability, and dependability) were employed, including participant checking, confirmation by academic supervisors and advisors, external auditing of the data analysis, and purposeful sampling of participants with diverse experiences. The findings indicated that the causal conditions contributing to divorce in the lived experiences of the studied couples resulted from a complex interplay of cultural, psychological, and social factors. Data analysis showed that dysfunctional family patterns and the intergenerational transmission of maladaptive schemas, the symbolic gender system and traditional beliefs about the roles of men and women, difficulties in emotion regulation and a lack of psychological literacy, strong dependency on the family of origin and interference by relatives, hasty marriages and uninformed partner selection, and dysfunctional marital beliefs were among the most significant causal conditions. Moreover, factors such as marital infidelity, lack of physical attractiveness, and neglect of personal care were highlighted in the couples’ narratives as the ultimate indicators of emotional and psychological disengagement. The analytical synthesis of the study suggests that causality in the divorce process is not a single-factor phenomenon but rather a complex overlap of three levels of causality: structural causality (gender attitudes and cultural pressures), psychological causality (lack of emotional and communication skills), and intergenerational causality (transmission of damaging family patterns). Ultimately, divorce in the cultural context of Shiraz reflects the tension between entrenched traditions and contemporary needs for an egalitarian, emotionally supportive, and dialogue-based relationship.

Mental Health and Lifestyle JournalVol. 3(4)
Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.