Unravelling Groundwater Storage Dynamics and Implication for River–Aquifer Interactions: A Nested‐Watershed Analysis in the Headwater Region of the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia

ABSTRACT Understanding aquifer storage characteristics is critical for revealing river–aquifer interactions and is thus essential for effective water resource management. Hydrological studies often analyse watersheds as single units, potentially overlooking spatial variability in groundwater storage, especially in diverse hydrogeological settings. This study examines groundwater storage dynamics and river–aquifer interactions in the Chemoga watershed, Ethiopia, using a nested‐watershed approach. Groundwater level data from eight monitoring stations and streamflow data from five gauging stations were integrated to assess groundwater storage dynamics. The Wilcoxon test revealed significant spatial variations ( p < 0.05) in median groundwater levels from 1.3 to 17 m, exhibiting temporal sensitivity with a coefficient of variation of 18%–55%. When analysed as a single unit, the watershed exhibited a mean annual storage of 191 mm year −1 . However, the nested‐watershed approach uncovered a wide range of mean annual storage values, from −302 to +1777 mm year −1 . Negative storage changes were observed in highland sub‐watersheds (GS1, GS2) and the Wuseta River sub‐watershed (GS4), whereas positive changes occurred in the midland floodplain (GS3) and lowland valley (GS5). These findings indicate that the Chemoga River acts as a gaining stream in the highlands but transitions to a losing stream in the midland floodplain and lowland valley. Additionally, a 1‐month lag in baseflow response and hydro–stratigraphic evidence suggest potential lateral flow from GS3 to GS4 sub‐watershed. This study highlights the limitations of treating watersheds as single units and advocates for spatially explicit approaches to better understand groundwater storage dynamics and river–aquifer interactions in complex hydrogeological environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70284
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unravelling Groundwater Storage Dynamics and Implication for River–Aquifer Interactions: A Nested‐Watershed Analysis in the Headwater Region of the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia

Ashebir Sewale Belay, Atsushi Tsunekawa, Nigussie Haregeweyn, Alebachew Tareke Kehali et al.
Hydrological Processes
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
article

Unravelling Groundwater Storage Dynamics and Implication for River–Aquifer Interactions: A Nested‐Watershed Analysis in the Headwater Region of the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia

Ashebir Sewale Belay, Atsushi Tsunekawa, Nigussie Haregeweyn, Alebachew Tareke Kehali, Getnet Taye Bawoke, Mitsuru Tsubo, Yoseph Buta Hailu, Belay B. Bizuneh, Ayele Almaw Fenta, Taye Minichil Meshesha, Samuel Berihun Kassa, Zena Tessema Terefe, Endawoke Mulu Gelaw
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Understanding aquifer storage characteristics is critical for revealing river–aquifer interactions and is thus essential for effective water resource management. Hydrological studies often analyse watersheds as single units, potentially overlooking spatial variability in groundwater storage, especially in diverse hydrogeological settings. This study examines groundwater storage dynamics and river–aquifer interactions in the Chemoga watershed, Ethiopia, using a nested‐watershed approach. Groundwater level data from eight monitoring stations and streamflow data from five gauging stations were integrated to assess groundwater storage dynamics. The Wilcoxon test revealed significant spatial variations ( p < 0.05) in median groundwater levels from 1.3 to 17 m, exhibiting temporal sensitivity with a coefficient of variation of 18%–55%. When analysed as a single unit, the watershed exhibited a mean annual storage of 191 mm year −1 . However, the nested‐watershed approach uncovered a wide range of mean annual storage values, from −302 to +1777 mm year −1 . Negative storage changes were observed in highland sub‐watersheds (GS1, GS2) and the Wuseta River sub‐watershed (GS4), whereas positive changes occurred in the midland floodplain (GS3) and lowland valley (GS5). These findings indicate that the Chemoga River acts as a gaining stream in the highlands but transitions to a losing stream in the midland floodplain and lowland valley. Additionally, a 1‐month lag in baseflow response and hydro–stratigraphic evidence suggest potential lateral flow from GS3 to GS4 sub‐watershed. This study highlights the limitations of treating watersheds as single units and advocates for spatially explicit approaches to better understand groundwater storage dynamics and river–aquifer interactions in complex hydrogeological environments.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 39(10)
Tottori University of Environmental Studies (JP), Tottori University (JP), Bahir Dar University (ET), University of Gondar (ET), Debre Markos University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.