Lower extremity impairments from a forensic medicine perspective: A descriptive study

This study examines disability and incapacity assessments and forensic medical processes related to lower extremity fractures. Reports prepared by the Forensic Medicine Council, Faculty of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, between 2022 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. As a result of the forensic medical evaluation, 1.89% of the cases (n=13) were excluded due to the inability to establish a causal relationship between the injury and the accident, 1.31% (n=9) were excluded due to previous injuries in the same region, and 1.31% (n=9) showed simulated findings. The Forensic Medicine Board reports prepared on the cases included in the study were evaluated within the scope of the 'Regulation on Disability Assessment for Adults' (in Turkish: Erişkinler İçin Engellilik Değerlendirmesi Hakkında Yönetmelik) rates. Of the 649 cases included in the study, 70.9% were male, and the most common cause of injury was traffic accidents (98.6%; n=640). The average disability rate in all cases was found to be 9.86% (SD=7.856) [11.59 (SD=8.965) for surgically treated cases, and 7.14 (SD=4.505) for conservatively treated cases]. It was observed that upper extremity injuries (22.8%) frequently accompanied lower extremity injuries. In orthopedic examination, joint motion restriction was more common with femur fractures, and leg length discrepancy was more frequently observed with femur, tibia, and multiple lower extremity fractures (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between atrophy and fracture sites. In forensic medical impairment assessments, establishing causality and accurately determining disability rates and recovery processes are crucial in legal proceedings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Sciences Quarterly
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26900/hsq.2820
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lower extremity impairments from a forensic medicine perspective: A descriptive study

Abdülkadir İzci, Bahar Özçelik, Betül Pekşen Koç, Uğur Kayhan et al.
Health Sciences Quarterly
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Lower extremity impairments from a forensic medicine perspective: A descriptive study

Abdülkadir İzci, Bahar Özçelik, Betül Pekşen Koç, Uğur Kayhan, Rukiye Akgüç, Selin Akut, Sude Nas Küpeli, Ulaş Belge, Zeynep Yazıcı, Çağatay Emre Dalar, Emirhan Arar, Hamza Ata, Hasan Akbaş, Onurhan Yılmaz
article en

Abstract

This study examines disability and incapacity assessments and forensic medical processes related to lower extremity fractures. Reports prepared by the Forensic Medicine Council, Faculty of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, between 2022 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. As a result of the forensic medical evaluation, 1.89% of the cases (n=13) were excluded due to the inability to establish a causal relationship between the injury and the accident, 1.31% (n=9) were excluded due to previous injuries in the same region, and 1.31% (n=9) showed simulated findings. The Forensic Medicine Board reports prepared on the cases included in the study were evaluated within the scope of the 'Regulation on Disability Assessment for Adults' (in Turkish: Erişkinler İçin Engellilik Değerlendirmesi Hakkında Yönetmelik) rates. Of the 649 cases included in the study, 70.9% were male, and the most common cause of injury was traffic accidents (98.6%; n=640). The average disability rate in all cases was found to be 9.86% (SD=7.856) [11.59 (SD=8.965) for surgically treated cases, and 7.14 (SD=4.505) for conservatively treated cases]. It was observed that upper extremity injuries (22.8%) frequently accompanied lower extremity injuries. In orthopedic examination, joint motion restriction was more common with femur fractures, and leg length discrepancy was more frequently observed with femur, tibia, and multiple lower extremity fractures (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between atrophy and fracture sites. In forensic medical impairment assessments, establishing causality and accurately determining disability rates and recovery processes are crucial in legal proceedings.

Health Sciences QuarterlyVol. 5(4)
Universidad CES (CO), Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.