SOKRATES VE DEMOKRASİNİN GERİLİMLERİ: BRENTON'UN CANCELLİNG SOCRATES ADLI OYUNU

This study explores the complex interplay between personal and political spheres as depicted in Howard Brenton's play Cancelling Socrates, alongside historical accounts of Socrates' trial and execution. Brenton’s play highlights the tension between individual values and societal demands through the contrasting perspectives of Xanthippe and Aspasia. Xanthippe’s dismissal of state concerns in favour of personal, familial realities underscores the clash between individual desires and political responsibilities. Aspasia’s emphasis on the state as the embodiment of the common good presents the democratic ideal in opposition to Xanthippe’s private sphere. This dynamic reflects the broader historical context of Socrates’ trial, where his philosophical inquiries and perceived corruption of Athenian youth provoked a democratic system struggling with internal contradictions. The study examines how Socrates’ role as a moral and intellectual provocateur challenged the democratic norms of his time, leading to his eventual prosecution. It also considers Brenton’s critique of civilization’s reliance on collective beliefs and norms, as articulated through Euthyphro's reflections in the play. This analysis reveals the enduring relevance of Socratic themes in understanding the tensions between personal integrity and political authority.