An Examination of Partly-Paid Shares in China’s New Company Law and Lessons for Comparative Company Law

China’s new Company Law introduces stricter capital contribution rules for partlypaid shares, while retaining the dominance of paid-up capital as the basis for profit distribution and pre-emption rights in share allotments. This reform appears to contrast with the global trend of relaxing legal capital regimes, thereby prompting a reexamination of the corporate legal regulation surrounding partly-paid shares. While paid-up capital quickly loses its relevance once a company begins operations, unpaid capital represents a future payment obligation on which creditors may reasonably rely. In this sense, China’s tightened capital contribution rules appear justifiable. That said, the complete elimination of partly-paid shares in public companies, along with the continued prioritization of paid-up capital as the basis for distribution, may unnecessarily restrict legal flexibility. This is particularly relevant given that partly-paid shares can facilitate customized financial and governance arrangements – especially for shareholders facing short-term financial constraints. This research may offer valuable insights for comparative company law, given the divergent approaches to partlypaid shares across jurisdictions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Business Law Review
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2025057
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Examination of Partly-Paid Shares in China’s New Company Law and Lessons for Comparative Company Law

Qiang Cai, Li Fei
European Business Law Review
Corporate Governance and Law
article

An Examination of Partly-Paid Shares in China’s New Company Law and Lessons for Comparative Company Law

Qiang Cai, Li Fei
article en

Abstract

China’s new Company Law introduces stricter capital contribution rules for partlypaid shares, while retaining the dominance of paid-up capital as the basis for profit distribution and pre-emption rights in share allotments. This reform appears to contrast with the global trend of relaxing legal capital regimes, thereby prompting a reexamination of the corporate legal regulation surrounding partly-paid shares. While paid-up capital quickly loses its relevance once a company begins operations, unpaid capital represents a future payment obligation on which creditors may reasonably rely. In this sense, China’s tightened capital contribution rules appear justifiable. That said, the complete elimination of partly-paid shares in public companies, along with the continued prioritization of paid-up capital as the basis for distribution, may unnecessarily restrict legal flexibility. This is particularly relevant given that partly-paid shares can facilitate customized financial and governance arrangements – especially for shareholders facing short-term financial constraints. This research may offer valuable insights for comparative company law, given the divergent approaches to partlypaid shares across jurisdictions.

European Business Law ReviewVol. 36(Issue 6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Examination of Partly-Paid Shares in China’s New Company Law and Lessons for Comparative Company Law — Qiang Cai, Li Fei · European Business Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS