形盡神全:儒家哲學對安樂死命題的三重分析

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 面對現代社會中關於安樂死的倫理爭議,本文從儒家生命哲學的視角出發,系統考察了苦樂、榮辱與生死三大核心問題,以回應安樂死所涉及的價值困惑。本文認為:第一,儒家在承認生理痛苦的同時,更強調道德主體對苦樂的超越性把握;第二,儒家的尊嚴觀以“仁義”為終極尺度,主張人格價值不受生理殘缺影響;第三,儒家死亡觀通過祭祀制度與“三不朽”思想構建了生命的倫理延續性,否定了將死亡簡化為終結的預設。總之,儒家對安樂死總體上持審慎乃至反對的立場。 In the context of contemporary ethical controversies, this paper systematically examines three core issues - suffering and joy, honour and disgrace, and life and death - from the perspective of Confucian life philosophy, aiming to address the value dilemmas inherent in euthanasia. The paper presents the following arguments: 1) Confucianism, while acknowledging physiological pain, emphasises the moral agent’s transcendent mastery over suffering and joy. 2) The Confucian view of dignity, grounded in benevolence and righteousness, asserts that personal worth remains unaffected by physical impairment. 3) Confucianism constructs an ethical continuity of life through sacrificial rituals and the doctrine of “three forms of immortality”, rejecting the reduction of death to mere termination. Essentially, Confucianism adopts a cautious stance of general opposition towards euthanasia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.233227
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

形盡神全:儒家哲學對安樂死命題的三重分析

Fang Yang, Fei Guo, Jing ZHANG
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine
Chinese history and philosophy
article

形盡神全:儒家哲學對安樂死命題的三重分析

Fang Yang, Fei Guo, Jing ZHANG
article en

Abstract

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 面對現代社會中關於安樂死的倫理爭議,本文從儒家生命哲學的視角出發,系統考察了苦樂、榮辱與生死三大核心問題,以回應安樂死所涉及的價值困惑。本文認為:第一,儒家在承認生理痛苦的同時,更強調道德主體對苦樂的超越性把握;第二,儒家的尊嚴觀以“仁義”為終極尺度,主張人格價值不受生理殘缺影響;第三,儒家死亡觀通過祭祀制度與“三不朽”思想構建了生命的倫理延續性,否定了將死亡簡化為終結的預設。總之,儒家對安樂死總體上持審慎乃至反對的立場。 In the context of contemporary ethical controversies, this paper systematically examines three core issues - suffering and joy, honour and disgrace, and life and death - from the perspective of Confucian life philosophy, aiming to address the value dilemmas inherent in euthanasia. The paper presents the following arguments: 1) Confucianism, while acknowledging physiological pain, emphasises the moral agent’s transcendent mastery over suffering and joy. 2) The Confucian view of dignity, grounded in benevolence and righteousness, asserts that personal worth remains unaffected by physical impairment. 3) Confucianism constructs an ethical continuity of life through sacrificial rituals and the doctrine of “three forms of immortality”, rejecting the reduction of death to mere termination. Essentially, Confucianism adopts a cautious stance of general opposition towards euthanasia.

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of MedicineVol. 23(1)
Naval University of Engineering (CN), United States Department of the Navy (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.