Thermal performance of brick masonry bonded by cement/geopolymer mortar: efficiency of built and repairing

Abstract This study evaluates the thermal resilience of geopolymer-based mortar (GM) compared to conventional cement mortar (CM) in brick masonry. Experiments were designed to investigate the failure behavior of CM and GM composite masonry at 400–800 °C. Physicomechanical performance was assessed through compressive and tensile bond strength, while physical performance was evaluated by crack characteristics and failure modes. Cost and feasibility analysis for a 3 m × 3 m masonry unit included initial construction and post-exposure repair costs. Experimental results showed that CM strength decreased drastically with temperature, losing up to 88% at 800 °C, while GM exhibited a 30.4% strength gain at 400 °C before a moderate decline at higher temperatures. Brick-CM composites experienced debonding above 400 °C, whereas brick-GM maintained bond strengths above 8 MPa (compression) and 0.2 MPa (tension) across all temperatures. The bond strength of GM increases with temperature (400–600 °C), which agrees with its physical performance, where cracks become smaller and less propagate due to autonomous self-healing. Failure modes correlated with strength variations, with GM shifting from cohesive to adhesive failures as temperature increased. CM developed extensive, interconnected cracking, while GM displayed smaller, isolated cracks up to 600 °C. Cost analysis revealed that although GM had the highest initial cost, hybrid systems offered substantial post-fire repair savings (up to 58%) over CM, making them economically favorable despite higher upfront investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-025-14798-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermal performance of brick masonry bonded by cement/geopolymer mortar: efficiency of built and repairing

Mohammed Abed, Khuram Rashid, Afia Razzaq, Éva Lublóy et al.
2 citations
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
1.91
article

Thermal performance of brick masonry bonded by cement/geopolymer mortar: efficiency of built and repairing

Mohammed Abed, Khuram Rashid, Afia Razzaq, Éva Lublóy, Khadija Mawra, Maheen Daud
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the thermal resilience of geopolymer-based mortar (GM) compared to conventional cement mortar (CM) in brick masonry. Experiments were designed to investigate the failure behavior of CM and GM composite masonry at 400–800 °C. Physicomechanical performance was assessed through compressive and tensile bond strength, while physical performance was evaluated by crack characteristics and failure modes. Cost and feasibility analysis for a 3 m × 3 m masonry unit included initial construction and post-exposure repair costs. Experimental results showed that CM strength decreased drastically with temperature, losing up to 88% at 800 °C, while GM exhibited a 30.4% strength gain at 400 °C before a moderate decline at higher temperatures. Brick-CM composites experienced debonding above 400 °C, whereas brick-GM maintained bond strengths above 8 MPa (compression) and 0.2 MPa (tension) across all temperatures. The bond strength of GM increases with temperature (400–600 °C), which agrees with its physical performance, where cracks become smaller and less propagate due to autonomous self-healing. Failure modes correlated with strength variations, with GM shifting from cohesive to adhesive failures as temperature increased. CM developed extensive, interconnected cracking, while GM displayed smaller, isolated cracks up to 600 °C. Cost analysis revealed that although GM had the highest initial cost, hybrid systems offered substantial post-fire repair savings (up to 58%) over CM, making them economically favorable despite higher upfront investment.

Journal of Thermal Analysis and CalorimetryVol. 150(20)
University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK), Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU), Genex Systems (United States) (US), Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center (US), Florida Atlantic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.