Which Respiratory Training is More Effective in Individuals with Ankylosing Spondylitis: 360-Degree Expansion Diaphragm Exercises or Standard Diaphragm Exercises? Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: Respiratory complications, though often asymptomatic, are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Despite the proven benefits of exercise in managing AS, limited evidence exists comparing conventional diaphragmatic breathing to novel, multidimensional approaches targeting full thoracic expansion. This study aimed to address this gap by evaluating the effectiveness of standard versus 360-degree expansion diaphragm breathing exercises—delivered with sensor-based feedback—in improving respiratory function, disease activity, and physical capacity in AS. Methods: Fifty individuals diagnosed with AS were randomized to either a standard diaphragm breathing group (DG) or a 360-degree expansion diaphragm group (360 DG). Both groups received supervised exercise interventions twice weekly for six weeks. Outcomes included pulmonary function tests (PFTs), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP), and AS-specific indices: BASFI, BASDAI, and BASMI. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in functional indices and respiratory parameters, with no statistically significant intergroup differences. Notably, FEV1/FVC improved in the DG group (p = 0.017), while FVC showed a significant increase in the 360 DG group (p = 0.007). Respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP) improved significantly in both groups. Conclusion: This randomized controlled trial is among the first to evaluate 360-degree expansive diaphragm breathing in AS. The findings suggest that both standard and sensor-guided breathing exercises are safe and effective in improving respiratory and functional outcomes. These results underscore the clinical relevance of incorporating tailored respiratory training into rehabilitation programs for AS, offering physiotherapists and clinicians flexible, evidence-based strategies to improve patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61399/ikcusbfd.1693424
Primary Topic
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which Respiratory Training is More Effective in Individuals with Ankylosing Spondylitis: 360-Degree Expansion Diaphragm Exercises or Standard Diaphragm Exercises? Randomized Controlled Trial

Barış GÜRPINAR, Seda Yakıt Yeşilyurt, İ̇smail Sarı, Özkan Urak
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
article

Which Respiratory Training is More Effective in Individuals with Ankylosing Spondylitis: 360-Degree Expansion Diaphragm Exercises or Standard Diaphragm Exercises? Randomized Controlled Trial

Barış GÜRPINAR, Seda Yakıt Yeşilyurt, İ̇smail Sarı, Özkan Urak
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Respiratory complications, though often asymptomatic, are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Despite the proven benefits of exercise in managing AS, limited evidence exists comparing conventional diaphragmatic breathing to novel, multidimensional approaches targeting full thoracic expansion. This study aimed to address this gap by evaluating the effectiveness of standard versus 360-degree expansion diaphragm breathing exercises—delivered with sensor-based feedback—in improving respiratory function, disease activity, and physical capacity in AS. Methods: Fifty individuals diagnosed with AS were randomized to either a standard diaphragm breathing group (DG) or a 360-degree expansion diaphragm group (360 DG). Both groups received supervised exercise interventions twice weekly for six weeks. Outcomes included pulmonary function tests (PFTs), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP), and AS-specific indices: BASFI, BASDAI, and BASMI. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in functional indices and respiratory parameters, with no statistically significant intergroup differences. Notably, FEV1/FVC improved in the DG group (p = 0.017), while FVC showed a significant increase in the 360 DG group (p = 0.007). Respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP) improved significantly in both groups. Conclusion: This randomized controlled trial is among the first to evaluate 360-degree expansive diaphragm breathing in AS. The findings suggest that both standard and sensor-guided breathing exercises are safe and effective in improving respiratory and functional outcomes. These results underscore the clinical relevance of incorporating tailored respiratory training into rehabilitation programs for AS, offering physiotherapists and clinicians flexible, evidence-based strategies to improve patient care.

İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi DergisiVol. 10(3)
İzmir University of Economics (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.