Entrepreneurial intentions are made, not born: the active role of institutional, educational and economic support

Purpose This study investigates how institutional, educational and economic pillars of university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems forge, rather than merely moderate, cognitive drivers of entrepreneurial intention. It advances that these contextual levers form a configurational antecedent, entrepreneurial ecosystem support (EES), that forges core personal motivators of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Design/methodology/approach EES is a second-order formative construct combining institutional support, training infrastructure and regional economic conditions. Two-stage PLS-SEM analyzes survey data from 492 students, faculty and staff in the Ingenium WP8 programme at an Italian university. MICOM-based multi-group analysis tests measurement invariance and compares structural paths across stakeholder groups. Findings EES strengthens self-efficacy (ß = 0.317), entrepreneurial attitude (ß = 0.303) and risk-taking (ß = 0.372). These predict entrepreneurial intention, with attitude showing the largest influence (ß = 0.632), followed by risk-taking (ß = 0.147) and self-efficacy (ß = 0.115). Mediation tests show EES reaches intention mainly through entrepreneurial attitude (ß = 0.191), with smaller paths via risk-taking and self-efficacy. The model explains 68.2% of variance in entrepreneurial intention, showing strong predictive power. MICOM and multi-group PLS analyses show no statistically significant differences in structural path between students and lecturers/staff (all two-tailed p-values = 0.144), indicating that the model operates similarly across both campus groups. Originality/value By operationalising ecosystem quality as a formative higher-order antecedent positioned upstream of TPB variables and documenting its equalising effects across stakeholder groups, the study re-centres context in intention-formation research and offers a diagnostic framework for universities aiming to engineer entrepreneurial capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-02-2025-0112
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entrepreneurial intentions are made, not born: the active role of institutional, educational and economic support

Armando Della Porta, Giacomo Zatini
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Entrepreneurial intentions are made, not born: the active role of institutional, educational and economic support

Armando Della Porta, Giacomo Zatini
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates how institutional, educational and economic pillars of university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems forge, rather than merely moderate, cognitive drivers of entrepreneurial intention. It advances that these contextual levers form a configurational antecedent, entrepreneurial ecosystem support (EES), that forges core personal motivators of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Design/methodology/approach EES is a second-order formative construct combining institutional support, training infrastructure and regional economic conditions. Two-stage PLS-SEM analyzes survey data from 492 students, faculty and staff in the Ingenium WP8 programme at an Italian university. MICOM-based multi-group analysis tests measurement invariance and compares structural paths across stakeholder groups. Findings EES strengthens self-efficacy (ß = 0.317), entrepreneurial attitude (ß = 0.303) and risk-taking (ß = 0.372). These predict entrepreneurial intention, with attitude showing the largest influence (ß = 0.632), followed by risk-taking (ß = 0.147) and self-efficacy (ß = 0.115). Mediation tests show EES reaches intention mainly through entrepreneurial attitude (ß = 0.191), with smaller paths via risk-taking and self-efficacy. The model explains 68.2% of variance in entrepreneurial intention, showing strong predictive power. MICOM and multi-group PLS analyses show no statistically significant differences in structural path between students and lecturers/staff (all two-tailed p-values = 0.144), indicating that the model operates similarly across both campus groups. Originality/value By operationalising ecosystem quality as a formative higher-order antecedent positioned upstream of TPB variables and documenting its equalising effects across stakeholder groups, the study re-centres context in intention-formation research and offers a diagnostic framework for universities aiming to engineer entrepreneurial capacity.

Journal of Small Business and Enterprise DevelopmentVol. 32(8)
University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.