Learning From the Past? EU Industrial Policy Challenges

ABSTRACT The European Union's current pursuit of strategic autonomy and technological sovereignty through industrial policy initiatives occurs amid intensifying US‐China competition, prompting new policy instruments and rhetoric that many scholars interpret as fundamental transformation in EU economic governance. However, historical analysis reveals striking parallels with the 1970s–1980s, when Europe confronted US technological dominance and Japanese competition. Drawing on historical institutionalist theory, extensive archival research, and seven interviews with key policymakers from the European Commission, this paper demonstrates how four interconnected structural constraints have maintained the EU's decentralized industrial policy governance across both periods. These constraints create what we term the “Competence Paradox”: external competitive pressures simultaneously create functional demands for centralized coordination while activating national sovereignty protection mechanisms that prevent such centralization. This analysis challenges interpretations of strategic autonomy as institutional transformation, revealing instead how external pressures generate innovation through institutional layering rather than governance transformation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Governance
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70068
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning From the Past? EU Industrial Policy Challenges

4 citations
Governance
Regional Development and Policy
34.09
article

Learning From the Past? EU Industrial Policy Challenges

article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The European Union's current pursuit of strategic autonomy and technological sovereignty through industrial policy initiatives occurs amid intensifying US‐China competition, prompting new policy instruments and rhetoric that many scholars interpret as fundamental transformation in EU economic governance. However, historical analysis reveals striking parallels with the 1970s–1980s, when Europe confronted US technological dominance and Japanese competition. Drawing on historical institutionalist theory, extensive archival research, and seven interviews with key policymakers from the European Commission, this paper demonstrates how four interconnected structural constraints have maintained the EU's decentralized industrial policy governance across both periods. These constraints create what we term the “Competence Paradox”: external competitive pressures simultaneously create functional demands for centralized coordination while activating national sovereignty protection mechanisms that prevent such centralization. This analysis challenges interpretations of strategic autonomy as institutional transformation, revealing instead how external pressures generate innovation through institutional layering rather than governance transformation.

GovernanceVol. 38(4)
Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Regional Development and Policy
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.