Five Years Later: Did Vavilov Kill Deference? Findings from the Ontario Divisional Court

In the 2019 decision Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, the Supreme Court of Canada attempted to provide greater clarity on the legal foundations and application of administrative law in Canada. This article presents new empirical data on the impact of Vavilov on decisions of the Ontario Divisional Court and considers what the results mean for practices of democracy, accountability, and the rule of law. The findings in this article reveal that Vavilov has had a significant judicial impact on Ontario Courts’ deference toward the decisions of administrative decision-makers, but that the lower standard of review associated with reasonableness creates the potential for arbitrary decisions and the abuse of state power for overtly partisan purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alberta Law Review
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2847
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Five Years Later: Did Vavilov Kill Deference? Findings from the Ontario Divisional Court

Greg Flynn, David Said
Alberta Law Review
European and International Law Studies
article

Five Years Later: Did Vavilov Kill Deference? Findings from the Ontario Divisional Court

Greg Flynn, David Said
article en

Abstract

In the 2019 decision Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, the Supreme Court of Canada attempted to provide greater clarity on the legal foundations and application of administrative law in Canada. This article presents new empirical data on the impact of Vavilov on decisions of the Ontario Divisional Court and considers what the results mean for practices of democracy, accountability, and the rule of law. The findings in this article reveal that Vavilov has had a significant judicial impact on Ontario Courts’ deference toward the decisions of administrative decision-makers, but that the lower standard of review associated with reasonableness creates the potential for arbitrary decisions and the abuse of state power for overtly partisan purposes.

Alberta Law Review
McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.