New Approaches to Automatic Termination of Contracts: A Comparative Study between Iranian Law, Iraqi Law, and the 1980 Vienna Convention (CISG)

The present study, entitled “New Approaches to Automatic Termination of Contracts: A Comparative Study between Iranian Law, Iraqi Law, and the 1980 Vienna Convention (CISG)”, analyzes the legal institution of Infisakh as one of the mechanisms for the involuntary termination of contracts. Within this framework, the concept of Infisakh and its distinction from rescission (Faskh) and annulment are examined, along with the conditions for its occurrence, including termination clauses, non-fulfillment of suspensive conditions, and force majeure, across the three legal systems. In Iranian law, although Infisakh lacks explicit statutory recognition, it can be inferred from Articles 229, 240, and 245 of the Civil Code. In Iraq, the 1951 Civil Code, influenced by Islamic jurisprudential theories and French civil law, prescribes more precise conditions for Infisakh and explicitly addresses it in Articles 261, 268, and 274. In contrast, the Vienna Convention adopts an approach based on voluntary termination, allowing automatic termination only if a termination clause is stipulated. The study reveals that although the concept of Infisakh is accepted in all three legal systems with the aim of maintaining contractual balance, there are fundamental differences regarding the mode of occurrence, the role of party autonomy, and its legal effects. In Iran and Iraq, Infisakh generally does not require judicial intervention, and the parties’ prior agreement plays a pivotal role in drafting the relevant clauses. Conversely, under the CISG, termination depends on formal notice and the existence of a “fundamental breach.” This research is conducted using an analytical–comparative method, relying on library resources, judicial precedents, and international instruments. In conclusion, by offering proposals for legislative reform and drafting model Infisakh clauses, the study provides practical solutions aimed at enhancing legal certainty and contractual efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.lsda.129
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Approaches to Automatic Termination of Contracts: A Comparative Study between Iranian Law, Iraqi Law, and the 1980 Vienna Convention (CISG)

Leila Raisi, Marwi Kareem Nayyef, Ahmed Razzaq Nayyef, Mojtaba Nikdosti
European and International Contract Law
article

New Approaches to Automatic Termination of Contracts: A Comparative Study between Iranian Law, Iraqi Law, and the 1980 Vienna Convention (CISG)

Leila Raisi, Marwi Kareem Nayyef, Ahmed Razzaq Nayyef, Mojtaba Nikdosti
article en

Abstract

The present study, entitled “New Approaches to Automatic Termination of Contracts: A Comparative Study between Iranian Law, Iraqi Law, and the 1980 Vienna Convention (CISG)”, analyzes the legal institution of Infisakh as one of the mechanisms for the involuntary termination of contracts. Within this framework, the concept of Infisakh and its distinction from rescission (Faskh) and annulment are examined, along with the conditions for its occurrence, including termination clauses, non-fulfillment of suspensive conditions, and force majeure, across the three legal systems. In Iranian law, although Infisakh lacks explicit statutory recognition, it can be inferred from Articles 229, 240, and 245 of the Civil Code. In Iraq, the 1951 Civil Code, influenced by Islamic jurisprudential theories and French civil law, prescribes more precise conditions for Infisakh and explicitly addresses it in Articles 261, 268, and 274. In contrast, the Vienna Convention adopts an approach based on voluntary termination, allowing automatic termination only if a termination clause is stipulated. The study reveals that although the concept of Infisakh is accepted in all three legal systems with the aim of maintaining contractual balance, there are fundamental differences regarding the mode of occurrence, the role of party autonomy, and its legal effects. In Iran and Iraq, Infisakh generally does not require judicial intervention, and the parties’ prior agreement plays a pivotal role in drafting the relevant clauses. Conversely, under the CISG, termination depends on formal notice and the existence of a “fundamental breach.” This research is conducted using an analytical–comparative method, relying on library resources, judicial precedents, and international instruments. In conclusion, by offering proposals for legislative reform and drafting model Infisakh clauses, the study provides practical solutions aimed at enhancing legal certainty and contractual efficiency.

Vol. 4(1)
Thi Qar University (IQ), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

New Approaches to Automatic Termination of Contracts: A Comparative Study between Iranian Law, Iraqi Law, and the 1980 Vienna Convention (CISG) — Leila Raisi, Marwi Kareem Nayyef, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS