Jurisprudential and Legal Analysis of the Legitimacy of Confiscating Assets Derived from Bribery and Its Impact on the Prevention of Financial Corruption

The confiscation and seizure of assets derived from bribery is considered one of the most important legal and criminal tools in the fight against financial corruption. Beyond its punitive function, this measure plays a preventive role in reducing the economic incentives to commit crimes. In the Islamic jurisprudential system, the principle of "the prohibition of consuming property through wrongful means" serves as the foundation for the legitimacy of confiscating illicit assets. Shiite jurists emphasize the necessity of returning assets obtained through financial corruption to their rightful owner or to the public treasury. In Iran's legal system, various laws—including the Islamic Penal Code, the Anti-Money Laundering Act, and the Law on the Promotion of Administrative Health—have established mechanisms for the confiscation of illicit property. However, at the implementation stage, several challenges arise, including the difficulty of distinguishing between licit and illicit assets, legal shortcomings, weak financial oversight, and prolonged judicial proceedings. Comparative analysis reveals that in many advanced legal systems, such as those of France and the United Kingdom, independent agencies exist to manage confiscated assets, and international cooperation for the repatriation of illicit assets to the country of origin is effectively carried out. In Iran, the absence of such mechanisms has, in some cases, resulted in the retention of assets derived from financial corruption by the perpetrators. This article, by examining the jurisprudential and legal foundations of asset confiscation and comparing them with international standards, emphasizes the need for legal reform, strengthening of financial oversight, acceleration of judicial procedures, and the establishment of independent institutions for managing seized assets, in order to enhance the effectiveness of anti-corruption policies in the country.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.lsda.100
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jurisprudential and Legal Analysis of the Legitimacy of Confiscating Assets Derived from Bribery and Its Impact on the Prevention of Financial Corruption

Nasim Mansouri Tehrani, Yasin Saeedi, AmirMohammad Sediqian
Corruption and Economic Development
article

Jurisprudential and Legal Analysis of the Legitimacy of Confiscating Assets Derived from Bribery and Its Impact on the Prevention of Financial Corruption

Nasim Mansouri Tehrani, Yasin Saeedi, AmirMohammad Sediqian
article en

Abstract

The confiscation and seizure of assets derived from bribery is considered one of the most important legal and criminal tools in the fight against financial corruption. Beyond its punitive function, this measure plays a preventive role in reducing the economic incentives to commit crimes. In the Islamic jurisprudential system, the principle of "the prohibition of consuming property through wrongful means" serves as the foundation for the legitimacy of confiscating illicit assets. Shiite jurists emphasize the necessity of returning assets obtained through financial corruption to their rightful owner or to the public treasury. In Iran's legal system, various laws—including the Islamic Penal Code, the Anti-Money Laundering Act, and the Law on the Promotion of Administrative Health—have established mechanisms for the confiscation of illicit property. However, at the implementation stage, several challenges arise, including the difficulty of distinguishing between licit and illicit assets, legal shortcomings, weak financial oversight, and prolonged judicial proceedings. Comparative analysis reveals that in many advanced legal systems, such as those of France and the United Kingdom, independent agencies exist to manage confiscated assets, and international cooperation for the repatriation of illicit assets to the country of origin is effectively carried out. In Iran, the absence of such mechanisms has, in some cases, resulted in the retention of assets derived from financial corruption by the perpetrators. This article, by examining the jurisprudential and legal foundations of asset confiscation and comparing them with international standards, emphasizes the need for legal reform, strengthening of financial oversight, acceleration of judicial procedures, and the establishment of independent institutions for managing seized assets, in order to enhance the effectiveness of anti-corruption policies in the country.

Vol. 4(1)
Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (IR), Islamic Azad University Maybod (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Jurisprudential and Legal Analysis of the Legitimacy of Confiscating Assets Derived from Bribery and Its Impact on the Prevention of Financial Corruption — Nasim Mansouri Tehrani, Yasin Saeedi, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS