Variation across the Border: Dialectin Arabic/English Translation

Translation is a multifaceted process that involves decisions at the phonological, morphological, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic, and textual levels. This paper examines dialect-related issues, which may involve one or more of these levels, from a translational perspective. It employs Halliday’s (1978) socio-semiotic approach to explore dialect-related features that are of relevance to the process and product of translation. The authentic textual data clearly shows that translators need to be sensitized to both user-related features and use-related features. While the former include dialectal and idiolectal features that may entirely or partially mark a discourse, the latter pertain to register-defining components, namely field, tenor, and mode of discourse. Athough there is a significant connection between these features, the present study focuses exclusively on user-related aspects The translator’s awareness of the various ways people use language to reflect their power, solidarity, status, education, and other aspects of social identity can significantly enhance the quality and naturalness of their translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Translation Linguistics and Literature
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54848/e4ztmb81
Primary Topic
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation across the Border: Dialectin Arabic/English Translation

Ali Almanna, Mohammed Farghal
British Journal of Translation Linguistics and Literature
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
article

Variation across the Border: Dialectin Arabic/English Translation

Ali Almanna, Mohammed Farghal
article en

Abstract

Translation is a multifaceted process that involves decisions at the phonological, morphological, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic, and textual levels. This paper examines dialect-related issues, which may involve one or more of these levels, from a translational perspective. It employs Halliday’s (1978) socio-semiotic approach to explore dialect-related features that are of relevance to the process and product of translation. The authentic textual data clearly shows that translators need to be sensitized to both user-related features and use-related features. While the former include dialectal and idiolectal features that may entirely or partially mark a discourse, the latter pertain to register-defining components, namely field, tenor, and mode of discourse. Athough there is a significant connection between these features, the present study focuses exclusively on user-related aspects The translator’s awareness of the various ways people use language to reflect their power, solidarity, status, education, and other aspects of social identity can significantly enhance the quality and naturalness of their translation.

British Journal of Translation Linguistics and LiteratureVol. 4(4)
Applied Science Private University (JO), Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Variation across the Border: Dialectin Arabic/English Translation — Ali Almanna, Mohammed Farghal · British Journal of Translation Linguistics and Literature (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS