Legal Challenges of Insurance and Customs Tariffs in Land Transportation of Oil and Gas: A Study in the Context of Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan

The transportation of oil and gas by land across Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan plays a pivotal role in regional energy security, yet it is confronted by complex legal challenges. This study examines the twin dimensions of insurance and customs tariffs, both of which directly determine the financial and operational feasibility of cross-border energy logistics. The findings reveal that insurance systems across the region suffer from underdevelopment, limited international participation, and persistent disputes over liability and claim settlement. In Iran, sanctions restrict access to global insurers and force reliance on domestic providers with limited capacity. Iraq struggles with post-conflict uncertainty, corruption, and inadequate enforcement mechanisms, while Afghanistan faces underdeveloped markets and dependence on foreign reinsurance. Pakistan, despite having a stronger insurance sector, is constrained by politicized regulations and limited harmonization with regional standards. Customs tariffs represent another layer of legal complexity. Iran’s exemptions favor state enterprises but create barriers for private actors. Iraq’s enforcement remains inconsistent due to corruption and weak border institutions. Afghanistan’s commitments under transit agreements are undermined by local tariff practices and its slow progress toward World Trade Organization standards. Pakistan’s tariff policies under the Afghan Transit Trade Agreement are marked by disputes and politicization, despite partial alignment with international trade rules. The comparative analysis demonstrates that while all four countries share weaknesses in harmonization, corruption, and instability, each faces distinct challenges. These legal shortcomings not only inflate costs and reduce predictability but also undermine regional cooperation and the development of energy corridors. The study concludes that legal reforms, harmonization of frameworks, and depoliticized administration are essential for achieving secure and efficient regional energy transportation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.lsda.197
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Challenges of Insurance and Customs Tariffs in Land Transportation of Oil and Gas: A Study in the Context of Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan

Ahmad Momeni Rad, Mojtaba Rooholamini
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

Legal Challenges of Insurance and Customs Tariffs in Land Transportation of Oil and Gas: A Study in the Context of Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan

Ahmad Momeni Rad, Mojtaba Rooholamini
article en

Abstract

The transportation of oil and gas by land across Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan plays a pivotal role in regional energy security, yet it is confronted by complex legal challenges. This study examines the twin dimensions of insurance and customs tariffs, both of which directly determine the financial and operational feasibility of cross-border energy logistics. The findings reveal that insurance systems across the region suffer from underdevelopment, limited international participation, and persistent disputes over liability and claim settlement. In Iran, sanctions restrict access to global insurers and force reliance on domestic providers with limited capacity. Iraq struggles with post-conflict uncertainty, corruption, and inadequate enforcement mechanisms, while Afghanistan faces underdeveloped markets and dependence on foreign reinsurance. Pakistan, despite having a stronger insurance sector, is constrained by politicized regulations and limited harmonization with regional standards. Customs tariffs represent another layer of legal complexity. Iran’s exemptions favor state enterprises but create barriers for private actors. Iraq’s enforcement remains inconsistent due to corruption and weak border institutions. Afghanistan’s commitments under transit agreements are undermined by local tariff practices and its slow progress toward World Trade Organization standards. Pakistan’s tariff policies under the Afghan Transit Trade Agreement are marked by disputes and politicization, despite partial alignment with international trade rules. The comparative analysis demonstrates that while all four countries share weaknesses in harmonization, corruption, and instability, each faces distinct challenges. These legal shortcomings not only inflate costs and reduce predictability but also undermine regional cooperation and the development of energy corridors. The study concludes that legal reforms, harmonization of frameworks, and depoliticized administration are essential for achieving secure and efficient regional energy transportation.

Vol. 4(3)
National Iranian Oil Company (Iran) (IR), University of Tehran (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.