Luteal Phase Support in IUI: A Game-Changer for Pregnancy Outcomes?

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the impact of luteal phase support (LPS) with progesterone on pregnancy and live birth rates in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 88 patients who underwent IUI treatment at a tertiary center between 2019 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=49) received progesterone for luteal phase support, while Group 2 (n=39) did not receive any luteal support. Clinical, demographic, and biochemical parameters, including age, BMI, infertility duration, and ovarian reserve markers, were compared between the two groups. Treatment outcomes such as pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates were analyzed. Results: No significant differences were observed between Group 1 and Group 2 in terms of demographic characteristics (age, BMI, and infertility duration) or biochemical markers (AMH, FSH, estradiol, and progesterone). The pregnancy rate in Group 1 was 14.2%, compared to 12.8% in Group 2 (p=0.640). Live birth rates were also similar between the groups (12.2% in Group 1 vs. 10.2% in Group 2, p=0.510). Treatment parameters, including endometrial thickness and gonadotropin dosage, showed no significant differences. Conclusion: Progesterone supplementation for luteal phase support did not significantly improve pregnancy or live birth rates in IUI patients. These findings suggest that luteal phase support may not be necessary in routine IUI cycles, particularly when standard ovulation induction protocols are followed. Further research is needed to clarify its role in specific patient populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38136/jgon.1724658
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Luteal Phase Support in IUI: A Game-Changer for Pregnancy Outcomes?

Özlem Moraloğlu Tekın, Batuhan Turgay, Mohammad İbrahim Halilzade, Uğurcan Zorlu et al.
Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi
Ovarian function and disorders
article

Luteal Phase Support in IUI: A Game-Changer for Pregnancy Outcomes?

Özlem Moraloğlu Tekın, Batuhan Turgay, Mohammad İbrahim Halilzade, Uğurcan Zorlu, Mert İshak Kaya
article en

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the impact of luteal phase support (LPS) with progesterone on pregnancy and live birth rates in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 88 patients who underwent IUI treatment at a tertiary center between 2019 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=49) received progesterone for luteal phase support, while Group 2 (n=39) did not receive any luteal support. Clinical, demographic, and biochemical parameters, including age, BMI, infertility duration, and ovarian reserve markers, were compared between the two groups. Treatment outcomes such as pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates were analyzed. Results: No significant differences were observed between Group 1 and Group 2 in terms of demographic characteristics (age, BMI, and infertility duration) or biochemical markers (AMH, FSH, estradiol, and progesterone). The pregnancy rate in Group 1 was 14.2%, compared to 12.8% in Group 2 (p=0.640). Live birth rates were also similar between the groups (12.2% in Group 1 vs. 10.2% in Group 2, p=0.510). Treatment parameters, including endometrial thickness and gonadotropin dosage, showed no significant differences. Conclusion: Progesterone supplementation for luteal phase support did not significantly improve pregnancy or live birth rates in IUI patients. These findings suggest that luteal phase support may not be necessary in routine IUI cycles, particularly when standard ovulation induction protocols are followed. Further research is needed to clarify its role in specific patient populations.

Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp DergisiVol. 22(3)
Ankara University (TR), Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Ovarian function and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.