A Critical Theoretical Study of NEP-2020

One significant step in reforming India's educational system is the National Education Policy 2020 (NEP 2020). Its main goals are to improve student learning, modernize education, and align it with international standards. Stronger educational facilities, improved teacher preparation, and skill-based learning are highlighted in the policy. Its primary objectives are to address long-term issues, bring equality, quality, and innovation to education, and get students ready for the demands of the twenty-first century. Three perspectives are used in this paper to examine NEP-2020: social justice, human capital theory, and critical pedagogy. It highlights the policy's positive aspects while also pointing out its drawbacks, such as excessive privatization, linguistic barriers, and unequal access to technology. The basic premise is that NEP-2020 has the potential to make significant strides, but it will encounter obstacles if there is insufficient funding, equitable policies, and public participation in decision-making. We conclude with recommendations for educators, legislators, and others to help NEP 2020 succeed and fulfill its objectives. Keywords: India, critical theory, education policy, and NEP-2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Naveen International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences (NIJMS)
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71126/nijms.v2i1.87
Primary Topic
Global Education Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Theoretical Study of NEP-2020

Pragya shrivastav, Nirmla
Naveen International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences (NIJMS)
Global Education Systems and Policies
article

A Critical Theoretical Study of NEP-2020

Pragya shrivastav, Nirmla
article en

Abstract

One significant step in reforming India's educational system is the National Education Policy 2020 (NEP 2020). Its main goals are to improve student learning, modernize education, and align it with international standards. Stronger educational facilities, improved teacher preparation, and skill-based learning are highlighted in the policy. Its primary objectives are to address long-term issues, bring equality, quality, and innovation to education, and get students ready for the demands of the twenty-first century. Three perspectives are used in this paper to examine NEP-2020: social justice, human capital theory, and critical pedagogy. It highlights the policy's positive aspects while also pointing out its drawbacks, such as excessive privatization, linguistic barriers, and unequal access to technology. The basic premise is that NEP-2020 has the potential to make significant strides, but it will encounter obstacles if there is insufficient funding, equitable policies, and public participation in decision-making. We conclude with recommendations for educators, legislators, and others to help NEP 2020 succeed and fulfill its objectives. Keywords: India, critical theory, education policy, and NEP-2020.

Naveen International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences (NIJMS)Vol. 2(1)
Bhagat Phool Singh Mahila Vishwavidyalaya (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Global Education Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Critical Theoretical Study of NEP-2020 — Pragya shrivastav, Nirmla · Naveen International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences (NIJMS) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS