Predictive Analysis for First Submission of Generic Drug Application for Orphan Drug Products Using Random Survival Forest

Rare diseases affect a small population of patients, resulting in low incentives for developing orphan drug products (ODPs). The United States Congress passed the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 to incentivize pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop drugs to treat rare diseases. However, ODPs generally have higher treatment costs than non-ODP treatments. Developing generic ODPs can benefit patients by increasing market competition and providing alternate treatment options. This research aims to identify factors influencing the first submission of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) for generic orphan drugs. Data were collected from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases (including but not limited to the FDA Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals database, Orange Book, and the internal drug product complexity designation) and the IQVIA sales database to inform the drug product information, regulatory factors, and pharmacoeconomic factors. The Random Survival Forest (RSF) machine learning method was employed to conduct the analysis for New Chemical Entities (NCEs) and non-NCEs. The modeling analysis was adequately assessed through both internal and external validations. For NCEs and non-NCEs, the RSF was able to predict ANDA submission with a repeated cross-validation C-index of 0.675 ± 0.0261 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.915) and 0.754 ± 0.0441 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.838), respectively. The variables with the highest importance in the RSF model to predict ANDA submission of NCE ODPs were sales data, while for non-NCEs, regulatory data was the most important (i.e., availability of product-specific guidances (PSGs)). As more data becomes available in the future, the RSF methodology will likely be able to predict ANDA submissions of ODPs more effectively. The model-informed results may be utilized in future intervention strategies to promote ANDA submissions for orphan drugs and to increase the availability of generic ODPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70365
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Analysis for First Submission of Generic Drug Application for Orphan Drug Products Using Random Survival Forest

Lanyan Fang, Robert Hopefl, Abhinav Ram Mohan, Myong‐Jin Kim et al.
Clinical and Translational Science
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

Predictive Analysis for First Submission of Generic Drug Application for Orphan Drug Products Using Random Survival Forest

Lanyan Fang, Robert Hopefl, Abhinav Ram Mohan, Myong‐Jin Kim, Wei‐Jhe Sun, Jing Wang, Meng Hu
article en

Abstract

Rare diseases affect a small population of patients, resulting in low incentives for developing orphan drug products (ODPs). The United States Congress passed the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 to incentivize pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop drugs to treat rare diseases. However, ODPs generally have higher treatment costs than non-ODP treatments. Developing generic ODPs can benefit patients by increasing market competition and providing alternate treatment options. This research aims to identify factors influencing the first submission of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) for generic orphan drugs. Data were collected from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases (including but not limited to the FDA Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals database, Orange Book, and the internal drug product complexity designation) and the IQVIA sales database to inform the drug product information, regulatory factors, and pharmacoeconomic factors. The Random Survival Forest (RSF) machine learning method was employed to conduct the analysis for New Chemical Entities (NCEs) and non-NCEs. The modeling analysis was adequately assessed through both internal and external validations. For NCEs and non-NCEs, the RSF was able to predict ANDA submission with a repeated cross-validation C-index of 0.675 ± 0.0261 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.915) and 0.754 ± 0.0441 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.838), respectively. The variables with the highest importance in the RSF model to predict ANDA submission of NCE ODPs were sales data, while for non-NCEs, regulatory data was the most important (i.e., availability of product-specific guidances (PSGs)). As more data becomes available in the future, the RSF methodology will likely be able to predict ANDA submissions of ODPs more effectively. The model-informed results may be utilized in future intervention strategies to promote ANDA submissions for orphan drugs and to increase the availability of generic ODPs.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 18(10)
United States Food and Drug Administration (US), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.